Hospital-Level Disparities in the Management and Outcomes of Cardiac Arrest Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction

There are limited contemporary data evaluating the relation between hospital characteristics and outcomes of patients with cardiac arrest complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CA). As such, we used the National Inpatient Sample database (2000 to 2017), to identify adult admissions with primary diagnosis of AMI and concomitant CA. Interhospital transfers were excluded, and hospitals were classified based on location and teaching status (rural, urban nonteaching, and urban teaching) and bed size (small, medium, and large). Among 494,083 AMI-CA admissions, 9.3% received care at rural hospitals, 43.4% at urban nonteaching hospitals, and 47.3% at urban teaching hospitals. Compared with urban nonteaching and teaching hospitals, AMI-CA admissions at rural hospitals received lower rates of cardiac and noncardiac procedures. Admissions to urban teaching hospitals had higher rates of acute organ failure, concomitant cardiogenic shock, and cardiac and noncardiac procedures. When hospitals were stratified by bed size, 9.8% of AMI-CA admissions were admitted to small capacity hospitals, 26.0% to medium capacity, and 64.2% to large capacity hospitals. The use of cardiac and noncardiac procedures was lower in small hospitals with higher rates of use in medium and large hospitals. In-hospital mortality was higher in urban nonteaching (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]1.14 to 1.20; p