Comparison of surgical outcomes after removal of epiretinal membrane associated with retinal break and idiopathic epiretinal membrane

Purpose To compare the surgical outcomes of epiretinal membranes (ERMs) associated with retinal break and idiopathic ERMs. Methods This retrospective study included patients with an idiopathic ERM or an ERM associated with retinal break, who were followed up for ≥ 6 months after ERM removal. The pos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology 2022-07, Vol.260 (7), p.2121-2128
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Dong Ik, Kim, Bo Hee, Bae, Ki Woong, Park, Un Chul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To compare the surgical outcomes of epiretinal membranes (ERMs) associated with retinal break and idiopathic ERMs. Methods This retrospective study included patients with an idiopathic ERM or an ERM associated with retinal break, who were followed up for ≥ 6 months after ERM removal. The postoperative functional and anatomical outcomes were compared between the groups. Results A total of 160 and 38 eyes (198 patients) were in the idiopathic and retinal break groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the baseline anatomical and functional parameters between the groups. At 6 months after surgery and at the final follow-up, best-corrected visual acuity, central foveal thickness, and ectopic inner foveal layer improved significantly in both groups, but there was no significant difference between the groups. In latter 49.0% of patients, tests for metamorphopsia and aniseikonia were performed. There was a significant improvement in the scores of metamorphopsia (0.40 ± 0.38 to 0.27 ± 0.28; p  
ISSN:0721-832X
1435-702X
DOI:10.1007/s00417-021-05550-0