Impact of eliminating urethral catheterization following ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy

Objectives To show that elimination of a urethral catheter in ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy cases is not disadvantageous. Methods We reviewed 164 non‐catheterized patients (experimental group) and 656 catheterized patients (control group) with renal or ureteral stones treated at our institution. Inc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of urology 2022-04, Vol.29 (4), p.337-342
Hauptverfasser: Hori, Shunsuke, Otsuki, Hideo, Fujio, Kei, Nakajima, Koichi, Mitsui, Yozo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To show that elimination of a urethral catheter in ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy cases is not disadvantageous. Methods We reviewed 164 non‐catheterized patients (experimental group) and 656 catheterized patients (control group) with renal or ureteral stones treated at our institution. Inclusion criteria were initial operation, patient age 18 to 75 years, no dysuria, and no preoperative febrile urinary tract infection due to calculi. The primary areas of evaluation were patient background, stone characteristics, perioperative factors, and postoperative evaluation results. Results The proportion of women was significantly lower (24.4% vs 37.2%; P = 0.01) and the proportion of multiple stone cases was significantly higher (34.9% vs 19.2%; P 
ISSN:0919-8172
1442-2042
DOI:10.1111/iju.14782