Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment vs. laser-assisted endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment: short-term results from a retrospective case-matched study

Background The aim of this study was to investigate whether the addition of laser to the endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT), laser-assisted EPSIT (LEPSIT) has an effect on the method and clinical results in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease (PSD). Methods Between September 2019 and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Techniques in coloproctology 2022-04, Vol.26 (4), p.271-277
Hauptverfasser: Gulcu, Baris, Ozturk, Ersin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The aim of this study was to investigate whether the addition of laser to the endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT), laser-assisted EPSIT (LEPSIT) has an effect on the method and clinical results in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease (PSD). Methods Between September 2019 and September 2020, patients who underwent LEPSIT and EPSIT procedures for PSD at Bursa Medicana Hospital, Turkey, were matched for age, pit location and number, body mass index (BMI), and sex. The primary endpoint was complete wound healing and the secondary endpoints were quality of life, cosmetic results, and cost. Results Twenty-four LEPSIT patients were matched to 72 EPSIT patients. Eighty-one (84.4%) of the included patients were male, and the median age was 26 years (range 16–52 years). The median follow-up time was 9 months (range 3–15 months).Wound healing rates (LEPSIT; 95.8% vs. EPSIT; 93%; p  = 0.99) were similar in both groups. In patients who underwent LEPSIT, the operative time ( p  = 0.00086) was significantly shorter, time taken to return to work ( p  = 0.03572) and wound closure ( p  
ISSN:1123-6337
1128-045X
DOI:10.1007/s10151-021-02568-8