Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment vs. laser-assisted endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment: short-term results from a retrospective case-matched study
Background The aim of this study was to investigate whether the addition of laser to the endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT), laser-assisted EPSIT (LEPSIT) has an effect on the method and clinical results in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease (PSD). Methods Between September 2019 and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Techniques in coloproctology 2022-04, Vol.26 (4), p.271-277 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The aim of this study was to investigate whether the addition of laser to the endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT), laser-assisted EPSIT (LEPSIT) has an effect on the method and clinical results in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease (PSD).
Methods
Between September 2019 and September 2020, patients who underwent LEPSIT and EPSIT procedures for PSD at Bursa Medicana Hospital, Turkey, were matched for age, pit location and number, body mass index (BMI), and sex. The primary endpoint was complete wound healing and the secondary endpoints were quality of life, cosmetic results, and cost.
Results
Twenty-four LEPSIT patients were matched to 72 EPSIT patients. Eighty-one (84.4%) of the included patients were male, and the median age was 26 years (range 16–52 years). The median follow-up time was 9 months (range 3–15 months).Wound healing rates (LEPSIT; 95.8% vs. EPSIT; 93%;
p
= 0.99) were similar in both groups. In patients who underwent LEPSIT, the operative time (
p
= 0.00086) was significantly shorter, time taken to return to work (
p
= 0.03572) and wound closure (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1123-6337 1128-045X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10151-021-02568-8 |