Effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position on internal carotid artery blood flow measured by ultrasound during robotic prostatectomy

Introduction Robotic prostatectomy requires pneumoperitoneum and a steep Trendelenburg position; however, this condition may compromise cerebral blood flow. Here, we evaluated the effect of pneumoperitoneum and the steep Trendelenburg position on internal carotid artery (ICA) blood flow measured by...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical physiology and functional imaging 2022-03, Vol.42 (2), p.139-145
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Jihion, Park, Jun‐Young, Hong, Jun Hyuk, Hwang, Jai‐Hyun, Kim, Young‐Kug
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Robotic prostatectomy requires pneumoperitoneum and a steep Trendelenburg position; however, this condition may compromise cerebral blood flow. Here, we evaluated the effect of pneumoperitoneum and the steep Trendelenburg position on internal carotid artery (ICA) blood flow measured by Doppler ultrasound during robotic prostatectomy. Methods Patients who underwent robotic prostatectomy were prospectively recruited. The ICA blood flow was measured at the following five time‐points: with the patient awake and in the supine position (Ta), 10 min after anaesthetic induction in the supine position (T1), 10 (T2) and 30 (T3) min after pneumoperitoneum in the steep Trendelenburg position, and at the end of surgery in the supine position after desufflation of the pneumoperitoneum (T4). Hemodynamic and cerebrovascular variables were measured at each time‐point. Results A total of 28 patients were evaluated. The ICA blood flows were significantly lower at T2 and T3 than at T1 (162.3 ± 44.7 [T2] vs. 188.0 ± 49.6 ml/min [T1]; p = .002, 163.1 ± 39.9 [T3] vs. 188.0 ± 49.6 ml/min [T1]; p = .009). The ICA blood flow also differed significantly between Ta and T1 (236.8 ± 58.3 vs. 188.0 ± 49.6 ml/min; p 
ISSN:1475-0961
1475-097X
DOI:10.1111/cpf.12742