Beach-level 24-hour forecasts of Florida red tide-induced respiratory irritation

•Respiratory irritation due to red tide is correctly forecast about 85% of the time.•Beach-specific data-driven models were developed to forecast 24 h ahead of time.•The Beach Condition Reporting System database provided training and validation data.•A wind-driven model and self-exciting Hawkes proc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Harmful algae 2022-01, Vol.111, p.102149-102149, Article 102149
Hauptverfasser: Ross, Shane D., Fish, Jeremie, Moeltner, Klaus, Bollt, Erik M., Bilyeu, Landon, Fanara, Tracy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Respiratory irritation due to red tide is correctly forecast about 85% of the time.•Beach-specific data-driven models were developed to forecast 24 h ahead of time.•The Beach Condition Reporting System database provided training and validation data.•A wind-driven model and self-exciting Hawkes process model performed well.•The model which performed best varied by beach. An accurate forecast of the red tide respiratory irritation level would improve the lives of many people living in areas affected by algal blooms. Using a decades-long database of daily beach conditions, two conceptually different models to forecast the respiratory irritation risk level one day ahead of time are trained. One model is wind-based, using the current days’ respiratory level and the predicted wind direction of the following day. The other model is a probabilistic self-exciting Hawkes process model. Both models are trained on beaches in Florida during 2011--2017 and applied to the red tide bloom during 2018-2019. For beaches where there is enough historical data to develop a model, the model which performs best depends on the beach. The wind-based model is the most accurate at half the beaches, correctly predicting the respiratory risk level on average about 84% of the time. The Hawkes model is the most accurate (81% accuracy) at nearly all of the remaining beaches.
ISSN:1568-9883
1878-1470
DOI:10.1016/j.hal.2021.102149