Ventricular versus atrial side ablation for treatment of atrioventricular accessory pathways: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Background The earliest atrial (A)/ventricular (V) activation potentials, or fused A/V potentials, are commonly used as ablation targets for atrioventricular (AV) accessory pathways (APs). However, these targets can be achieved in a relatively wide area of the heart around AV rings at both atrial and ventricular sides. The aim of this study is to analyze the height of intracardiac A and V waves and their correlation to find the most appropriate side for successful delivery of radiofrequency energy, atrial or ventricular edge. Methods Ninety patients diagnosed with orthodromic AV re-entrant tachycardia (AVRT) or Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome were enrolled. Local atrial/ventricular (A/V) amplitude potentials with the earliest activation or fused AV potentials were measured. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups with a 2:1 ratio. In group 1, ablation was done at the site where A was greater than V. In group 2, V was greater than A. Primary endpoint was success at first attempt, achieving antegrade AP conduction block, AV block during right ventricle pacing, or AVRT termination with no AP conduction. Results Fifty-one patients (56.7%) were male. Thirty patients had an ablation at an atrial site (A > V) and 60 at a ventricular site (V > A). Ablation was more successful at the ventricular site (87% vs 100%, P = 0.011). All 30 patients in the atrial arm and 71% of the ventricular group underwent ablation via the antegrade method. Conclusions Success of catheter ablation of APs is higher where V > A (ventricular site of AP), indicating the priority of the ventricular edge of the mitral ring for a better outcome.