Collaboratively Maximizing the Impact of Human-Centered Design in Psychological and Implementation Science: Reply to Proctor et al. (2021)

Collaboratively Maximizing the Impact of Human-Centered Design in Psychological and Implementation Science: Reply to Proctor et al. (2021)

Proctor et al.'s (2021) comment "Division 21 Has Been Devoted to Human-Centered Design Since the 1950s" on our article (Lyon et al., 2020) is a welcome addition and useful touchpoint surrounding the historical and current relationship between human-centered design and psychological sc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American psychologist 2021-10, Vol.76 (7), p.1189-1190
Hauptverfasser: Lyon, Aaron R., Brewer, Stephanie K., Areán, Patricia A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Behavioral Sciences
Engineering Psychology
Human
Human Factors Engineering
Humans
Implementation Science
Psychology
Sciences
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1190
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1189
container_title The American psychologist
container_volume 76
creator Lyon, Aaron R.
Brewer, Stephanie K.
Areán, Patricia A.
description Proctor et al.'s (2021) comment "Division 21 Has Been Devoted to Human-Centered Design Since the 1950s" on our article (Lyon et al., 2020) is a welcome addition and useful touchpoint surrounding the historical and current relationship between human-centered design and psychological science. "Siloing" in psychology inhibits the progress of the discipline. We offer a set of recommendations for reducing silos and increasing the integration of engineering psychology with implementation science to advance human-centered design and the use of research evidence in practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/amp0000856
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2618228100</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2618228100</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-a3d44760da0fcd05bd542ae47f3eca0d491c2504f0c99b95fa3279ea62d527513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcuKFDEUhoMoTtu68QEk4GYUe8ylklTcSXuZgREHLzC7kE6d6slQldQkKbF9BJ_aND0quPAscjjhy3_C_yP0mJITSrh6aceJ1GqFvIMWVHOx0ppc3kWLeslXRMrLI_Qg5-s6ilbT--iIN5Wgii_Qz3UcBruJyRb_DYYd_mC_-9H_8GGLyxXgs3GyruDY49N5tGG1hlAgQYffQPbbgH3AF3nnruIQt97ZAdvQ7R8NMFayisaAPzsPwcEr_AmmuqFEfJGiKzFhKNgOJ_iYEUafPUT3ejtkeHTbl-jru7df1qer84_vz9avz1eWK1Hq2TWNkqSzpHcdEZtONMxCo3oOzpKu0dQxQZqeOK03WvSWM6XBStYJpgTlS3R80J1SvJkhFzP67KDaECDO2TBJW8ZaWs1boqf_oNdxTqH-rlJMaqGVFP-nqCK0bVtZqecHyqWYc4LeTMmPNu0MJWafo_mbY4Wf3ErOmxG6P-jv4Crw4gDYyZqpJmBT8W6A7OaUqvN7MaOkUYbSVvNfqemm-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2617018886</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Collaboratively Maximizing the Impact of Human-Centered Design in Psychological and Implementation Science: Reply to Proctor et al. (2021)</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Lyon, Aaron R. ; Brewer, Stephanie K. ; Areán, Patricia A.</creator><contributor>Cooper, Harris ; Kazak, Anne E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lyon, Aaron R. ; Brewer, Stephanie K. ; Areán, Patricia A. ; Cooper, Harris ; Kazak, Anne E</creatorcontrib><description>Proctor et al.'s (2021) comment "Division 21 Has Been Devoted to Human-Centered Design Since the 1950s" on our article (Lyon et al., 2020) is a welcome addition and useful touchpoint surrounding the historical and current relationship between human-centered design and psychological science. "Siloing" in psychology inhibits the progress of the discipline. We offer a set of recommendations for reducing silos and increasing the integration of engineering psychology with implementation science to advance human-centered design and the use of research evidence in practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-066X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-990X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/amp0000856</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34990173</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Behavioral Sciences ; Engineering Psychology ; Human ; Human Factors Engineering ; Humans ; Implementation Science ; Psychology ; Sciences</subject><ispartof>The American psychologist, 2021-10, Vol.76 (7), p.1189-1190</ispartof><rights>2021 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2021, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Oct 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-3657-5060 ; 0000-0001-5699-5121</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34990173$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Cooper, Harris</contributor><contributor>Kazak, Anne E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lyon, Aaron R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Stephanie K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Areán, Patricia A.</creatorcontrib><title>Collaboratively Maximizing the Impact of Human-Centered Design in Psychological and Implementation Science: Reply to Proctor et al. (2021)</title><title>The American psychologist</title><addtitle>Am Psychol</addtitle><description>Proctor et al.'s (2021) comment "Division 21 Has Been Devoted to Human-Centered Design Since the 1950s" on our article (Lyon et al., 2020) is a welcome addition and useful touchpoint surrounding the historical and current relationship between human-centered design and psychological science. "Siloing" in psychology inhibits the progress of the discipline. We offer a set of recommendations for reducing silos and increasing the integration of engineering psychology with implementation science to advance human-centered design and the use of research evidence in practice.</description><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Engineering Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Factors Engineering</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implementation Science</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Sciences</subject><issn>0003-066X</issn><issn>1935-990X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcuKFDEUhoMoTtu68QEk4GYUe8ylklTcSXuZgREHLzC7kE6d6slQldQkKbF9BJ_aND0quPAscjjhy3_C_yP0mJITSrh6aceJ1GqFvIMWVHOx0ppc3kWLeslXRMrLI_Qg5-s6ilbT--iIN5Wgii_Qz3UcBruJyRb_DYYd_mC_-9H_8GGLyxXgs3GyruDY49N5tGG1hlAgQYffQPbbgH3AF3nnruIQt97ZAdvQ7R8NMFayisaAPzsPwcEr_AmmuqFEfJGiKzFhKNgOJ_iYEUafPUT3ejtkeHTbl-jru7df1qer84_vz9avz1eWK1Hq2TWNkqSzpHcdEZtONMxCo3oOzpKu0dQxQZqeOK03WvSWM6XBStYJpgTlS3R80J1SvJkhFzP67KDaECDO2TBJW8ZaWs1boqf_oNdxTqH-rlJMaqGVFP-nqCK0bVtZqecHyqWYc4LeTMmPNu0MJWafo_mbY4Wf3ErOmxG6P-jv4Crw4gDYyZqpJmBT8W6A7OaUqvN7MaOkUYbSVvNfqemm-w</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Lyon, Aaron R.</creator><creator>Brewer, Stephanie K.</creator><creator>Areán, Patricia A.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3657-5060</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5699-5121</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Collaboratively Maximizing the Impact of Human-Centered Design in Psychological and Implementation Science: Reply to Proctor et al. (2021)</title><author>Lyon, Aaron R. ; Brewer, Stephanie K. ; Areán, Patricia A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-a3d44760da0fcd05bd542ae47f3eca0d491c2504f0c99b95fa3279ea62d527513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Engineering Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Factors Engineering</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implementation Science</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lyon, Aaron R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Stephanie K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Areán, Patricia A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lyon, Aaron R.</au><au>Brewer, Stephanie K.</au><au>Areán, Patricia A.</au><au>Cooper, Harris</au><au>Kazak, Anne E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Collaboratively Maximizing the Impact of Human-Centered Design in Psychological and Implementation Science: Reply to Proctor et al. (2021)</atitle><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle><addtitle>Am Psychol</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1189</spage><epage>1190</epage><pages>1189-1190</pages><issn>0003-066X</issn><eissn>1935-990X</eissn><abstract>Proctor et al.'s (2021) comment "Division 21 Has Been Devoted to Human-Centered Design Since the 1950s" on our article (Lyon et al., 2020) is a welcome addition and useful touchpoint surrounding the historical and current relationship between human-centered design and psychological science. "Siloing" in psychology inhibits the progress of the discipline. We offer a set of recommendations for reducing silos and increasing the integration of engineering psychology with implementation science to advance human-centered design and the use of research evidence in practice.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>34990173</pmid><doi>10.1037/amp0000856</doi><tpages>2</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3657-5060</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5699-5121</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-066X
ispartof The American psychologist, 2021-10, Vol.76 (7), p.1189-1190
issn 0003-066X
1935-990X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2618228100
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Behavioral Sciences
Engineering Psychology
Human
Human Factors Engineering
Humans
Implementation Science
Psychology
Sciences
title Collaboratively Maximizing the Impact of Human-Centered Design in Psychological and Implementation Science: Reply to Proctor et al. (2021)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T10%3A38%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Collaboratively%20Maximizing%20the%20Impact%20of%20Human-Centered%20Design%20in%20Psychological%20and%20Implementation%20Science:%20Reply%20to%20Proctor%20et%20al.%20(2021)&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20psychologist&rft.au=Lyon,%20Aaron%20R.&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1189&rft.epage=1190&rft.pages=1189-1190&rft.issn=0003-066X&rft.eissn=1935-990X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/amp0000856&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2618228100%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2617018886&rft_id=info:pmid/34990173&rfr_iscdi=true