Collaboratively Maximizing the Impact of Human-Centered Design in Psychological and Implementation Science: Reply to Proctor et al. (2021)

Proctor et al.'s (2021) comment "Division 21 Has Been Devoted to Human-Centered Design Since the 1950s" on our article (Lyon et al., 2020) is a welcome addition and useful touchpoint surrounding the historical and current relationship between human-centered design and psychological sc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American psychologist 2021-10, Vol.76 (7), p.1189-1190
Hauptverfasser: Lyon, Aaron R., Brewer, Stephanie K., Areán, Patricia A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Proctor et al.'s (2021) comment "Division 21 Has Been Devoted to Human-Centered Design Since the 1950s" on our article (Lyon et al., 2020) is a welcome addition and useful touchpoint surrounding the historical and current relationship between human-centered design and psychological science. "Siloing" in psychology inhibits the progress of the discipline. We offer a set of recommendations for reducing silos and increasing the integration of engineering psychology with implementation science to advance human-centered design and the use of research evidence in practice.
ISSN:0003-066X
1935-990X
DOI:10.1037/amp0000856