Collaboratively Maximizing the Impact of Human-Centered Design in Psychological and Implementation Science: Reply to Proctor et al. (2021)
Proctor et al.'s (2021) comment "Division 21 Has Been Devoted to Human-Centered Design Since the 1950s" on our article (Lyon et al., 2020) is a welcome addition and useful touchpoint surrounding the historical and current relationship between human-centered design and psychological sc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American psychologist 2021-10, Vol.76 (7), p.1189-1190 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Proctor et al.'s (2021) comment "Division 21 Has Been Devoted to Human-Centered Design Since the 1950s" on our article (Lyon et al., 2020) is a welcome addition and useful touchpoint surrounding the historical and current relationship between human-centered design and psychological science. "Siloing" in psychology inhibits the progress of the discipline. We offer a set of recommendations for reducing silos and increasing the integration of engineering psychology with implementation science to advance human-centered design and the use of research evidence in practice. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-066X 1935-990X |
DOI: | 10.1037/amp0000856 |