Automated quantitative lesion water uptake in acute stroke is a predictor of malignant cerebral edema

Objectives Net water uptake (NWU) has been shown to have a linear relationship with brain edema. Based on an automated-Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) technique, we automatically derived NWU from baseline multimodal computed tomography (CT), namely ASPECTS-NWU. We ai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2022-04, Vol.32 (4), p.2771-2780
Hauptverfasser: Shi, JiaQian, Wu, Hang, Dong, Zheng, Liang, XianXian, Liu, QuanHui, Zhu, Wusheng, Zhou, ChangSheng, Lu, MengJie, Liu, Jia, Su, XiaoQin, Lu, GuangMing, Cheng, XiaoQing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives Net water uptake (NWU) has been shown to have a linear relationship with brain edema. Based on an automated-Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) technique, we automatically derived NWU from baseline multimodal computed tomography (CT), namely ASPECTS-NWU. We aimed to determine if ASPECTS-NWU can predict the development of malignant cerebral edema (MCE). Methods One hundred and forty-six patients with large-vessel occlusion were retrospectively enrolled. Quantitative NWU based on automated-ASPECTS was measured both on nonenhanced CT (NECT) and CT angiography (CTA), namely NECT-ASPECT-NWU and CTA-ASPECTS-NWU. The correlation between ASPECTS-NWU and cerebral edema (CED) grades was calculated using Spearman rank correlation. Univariate logistic regression was used to assess the effect of radiological and clinical features on MCE, and a multivariable model with significant factors from the univariate regression analysis was built. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was obtained and area under curve (AUC) was compared. Results CTA-ASPECTS-NWU had a moderate positive correlation with CED grades ( r  = 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51–0.71; p  
ISSN:0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-021-08443-2