Oral Feeding in Infants After Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair While on Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation: The Impact of a Dysphagia Provider-Led Protocol

Infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) who require non-invasive positive pressure ventilation or high flow nasal cannula are at risk for aspiration and delayed initiation of oral feeding. We developed a dysphagia provider-led protocol that involved early consultation with an occupational...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dysphagia 2022-10, Vol.37 (5), p.1305-1313
Hauptverfasser: Schwab, Marisa E., Crennan, Miriam, Burke, Shannon, Sang, Helen, Klarich, Mary Kate, Keller, Roberta L., Vu, Lan T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) who require non-invasive positive pressure ventilation or high flow nasal cannula are at risk for aspiration and delayed initiation of oral feeding. We developed a dysphagia provider-led protocol that involved early consultation with an occupational therapist or speech/language pathologist and modified barium swallow study (MBSS) to assess for readiness for oral feeding initiation/advancement on non-invasive positive pressure ventilation. The objective of this study was to retrospectively compare this intervention cohort to a historical control cohort to evaluate the protocol’s impact on the time to initiate oral feeding. We describe the development and implementation of the protocol, the MBSS findings of the intervention cohort, and compared the control ( n  = 64) and intervention ( n  = 37) cohorts using Fischer’s exact test and Mann–Whitney test. We found that both cohorts had similar prenatal and neonatal characteristics including age at extubation. Significantly more infants in the intervention cohort were on non-invasive positive pressure ventilation or high flow nasal cannula at the time of oral feeding initiation (84% vs. 28%, p  
ISSN:0179-051X
1432-0460
DOI:10.1007/s00455-021-10391-4