Effectiveness of clip-and-thread traction-assisted duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a propensity score–matched study (with video)

The indications for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) remain controversial because the procedure is technically challenging. Moreover, the effectiveness of clip-and-thread traction-assisted ESD (TA-ESD) for SNADETs has not been assessed. The aim of the current study was to compare the effectiveness of duodenal TA-ESD and conventional ESD for SNADETs. SNADETs treated with conventional ESD or TA-ESD between April 2017 and March 2021 at Saitama Medical University International Medical Center were evaluated retrospectively. There were 49 cases of conventional ESD and 32 cases of TA-ESD for SNADETs. Using a propensity score–matched design, we selected 26 pairs of cases with conventional ESD and TA-ESD. In the unmatched cohort, patients treated with TA-ESD were characterized by a higher R0 (no tumor identified at the lateral or vertical margins) resection rate (P = .004), more frequent poor submucosal lifting because of fibrosis (P = .014), and shorter follow-up period (P = .0004) than patients treated with conventional ESD. In the propensity score–matched pairs, patients treated with TA-ESD were characterized by a higher rate of R0 resection (P = .021) and a shorter follow-up period (P = .0061). The findings regarding R0 resection rates were confirmed by multivariate logistic regression models, which found a higher odds ratio (OR) for R0 resection in patients who underwent TA-ESD than in patients who underwent conventional ESD both in the unmatched cohort (OR, 17.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-178.8; P = .018) and in the propensity score–matched pairs (OR, 26.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-460.2; P = .024). Our findings suggest TA-ESD may increase the rate of R0 resection in patients with SNADETs in comparison with conventional ESD. [Display omitted]