Wear of bulk-fill resin composites
Bulk-fill resin composites are a special group of restorative materials designed to reduce chair time needed to insert a direct composite restoration. However, other factors determine the clinical success of a restorative material. Clinically the major reasons for failure of direct restorations are...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Dental materials 2022-03, Vol.38 (3), p.549-553 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 553 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 549 |
| container_title | Dental materials |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Osiewicz, Magdalena A. Werner, Arie Roeters, Franciscus J.M. Kleverlaan, Cornelis J. |
| description | Bulk-fill resin composites are a special group of restorative materials designed to reduce chair time needed to insert a direct composite restoration. However, other factors determine the clinical success of a restorative material. Clinically the major reasons for failure of direct restorations are secondary caries and fracture of the restoration or the tooth itself. In the long-term composite resin restorations in posterior teeth may be prone to wear. As bulk-fill materials have their own composition that will determine their mechanical properties, the wear resistance may be affected as well. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the wear of bulk-fill composites in comparison with a conventional hybrid composite. The null hypothesis was that there are no differences between the four bulk-fill materials and one traditional highly filled nanohybrid composite for posterior use when subjected to a two-body wear rate test and hardness measurement.
Four bulk-fill composites SDR Smart Dentin Replacement (SDR), X-tra base (XBA), FiltekBulk Fill (FUP), Dual-Curing Bulk Composite (FBFL) and conventional nanohybrid resin composite Grandio (GDO) subjected to a two-body wear test against a stainless steel (SS) antagonist wheel. Scanning Electron Microscopy analysis was performed to detect the surface alterations. Microhardness of all samples was tested (n = 5) with a Vickers diamond indenter (5 indentations in each specimen). One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.dental.2021.12.138 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2615922396</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0109564121004735</els_id><sourcerecordid>2648263114</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-333828a9e147924242d7bde40966bf20be5d6c8fd36d15ac5e28d949ceeaa1c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6D0QWvXhpzSRp2lwEWfyCBS-Kx5AmU8jabdekFfz3Zln14EHmMJfnfWd4CDkFmgMFebXKHXaDaXNGGeTAcuDVHplCVaqMUlXukykFqrJCCpiQoxhXlFLBFBySCReqZEVFp-T8FU2Y9828Htu3rPFtOw8YfTe3_XrTRz9gPCYHjWkjnnzvGXm5u31ePGTLp_vHxc0ys4LLIeOcV6wyCkGUiok0rqwdCqqkrBtGayyctFXjuHRQGFsgq5wSyiIaA5bzGbnc9W5C_z5iHPTaR4ttazrsx6iZhEIxxpVM6MUfdNWPoUvfJUpUTHIAkSixo2zoYwzY6E3waxM-NVC9dahXeudQbx1qYDo5TLGz7_KxXqP7Df1IS8D1DsBk48Nj0NF67Cw6H9AO2vX-_wtfeHiBtA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2648263114</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wear of bulk-fill resin composites</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Osiewicz, Magdalena A. ; Werner, Arie ; Roeters, Franciscus J.M. ; Kleverlaan, Cornelis J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Osiewicz, Magdalena A. ; Werner, Arie ; Roeters, Franciscus J.M. ; Kleverlaan, Cornelis J.</creatorcontrib><description>Bulk-fill resin composites are a special group of restorative materials designed to reduce chair time needed to insert a direct composite restoration. However, other factors determine the clinical success of a restorative material. Clinically the major reasons for failure of direct restorations are secondary caries and fracture of the restoration or the tooth itself. In the long-term composite resin restorations in posterior teeth may be prone to wear. As bulk-fill materials have their own composition that will determine their mechanical properties, the wear resistance may be affected as well. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the wear of bulk-fill composites in comparison with a conventional hybrid composite. The null hypothesis was that there are no differences between the four bulk-fill materials and one traditional highly filled nanohybrid composite for posterior use when subjected to a two-body wear rate test and hardness measurement.
Four bulk-fill composites SDR Smart Dentin Replacement (SDR), X-tra base (XBA), FiltekBulk Fill (FUP), Dual-Curing Bulk Composite (FBFL) and conventional nanohybrid resin composite Grandio (GDO) subjected to a two-body wear test against a stainless steel (SS) antagonist wheel. Scanning Electron Microscopy analysis was performed to detect the surface alterations. Microhardness of all samples was tested (n = 5) with a Vickers diamond indenter (5 indentations in each specimen). One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test (P < 0.01) were used to analyze differences in wear values. The hardness data were submitted to one-way ANOVA test, followed by the Tukey post hoc test (α = 0.05). T-test was applied to compare wear rate in time interval between one day and one month.
The highest wear rate values were recorded for SDR and the lowest wear rate values were for GDO. Hardness was the highest for GDO and the lowest for FBFL.
The bulk-fill composites have a higher wear rate and lower hardness than the conventional nanohybrid composite, making them less suitable for stress-bearing restorations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0109-5641</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.12.138</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34972580</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adhesive wear ; Bulk-fill ; Composite materials ; Composite resin ; Composite Resins ; Dental caries ; Dental cement ; Dental material ; Dental Materials ; Dentin ; Diamonds ; Hardness ; Hardness measurement ; Hybrid composites ; Materials Testing ; Mechanical properties ; Resins ; Restoration ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Stainless steel ; Stainless steels ; Tooth wear ; Variance analysis ; Wear ; Wear rate ; Wear resistance ; Wear tests</subject><ispartof>Dental materials, 2022-03, Vol.38 (3), p.549-553</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Mar 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-333828a9e147924242d7bde40966bf20be5d6c8fd36d15ac5e28d949ceeaa1c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-333828a9e147924242d7bde40966bf20be5d6c8fd36d15ac5e28d949ceeaa1c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.12.138$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34972580$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Osiewicz, Magdalena A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Arie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roeters, Franciscus J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleverlaan, Cornelis J.</creatorcontrib><title>Wear of bulk-fill resin composites</title><title>Dental materials</title><addtitle>Dent Mater</addtitle><description>Bulk-fill resin composites are a special group of restorative materials designed to reduce chair time needed to insert a direct composite restoration. However, other factors determine the clinical success of a restorative material. Clinically the major reasons for failure of direct restorations are secondary caries and fracture of the restoration or the tooth itself. In the long-term composite resin restorations in posterior teeth may be prone to wear. As bulk-fill materials have their own composition that will determine their mechanical properties, the wear resistance may be affected as well. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the wear of bulk-fill composites in comparison with a conventional hybrid composite. The null hypothesis was that there are no differences between the four bulk-fill materials and one traditional highly filled nanohybrid composite for posterior use when subjected to a two-body wear rate test and hardness measurement.
Four bulk-fill composites SDR Smart Dentin Replacement (SDR), X-tra base (XBA), FiltekBulk Fill (FUP), Dual-Curing Bulk Composite (FBFL) and conventional nanohybrid resin composite Grandio (GDO) subjected to a two-body wear test against a stainless steel (SS) antagonist wheel. Scanning Electron Microscopy analysis was performed to detect the surface alterations. Microhardness of all samples was tested (n = 5) with a Vickers diamond indenter (5 indentations in each specimen). One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test (P < 0.01) were used to analyze differences in wear values. The hardness data were submitted to one-way ANOVA test, followed by the Tukey post hoc test (α = 0.05). T-test was applied to compare wear rate in time interval between one day and one month.
The highest wear rate values were recorded for SDR and the lowest wear rate values were for GDO. Hardness was the highest for GDO and the lowest for FBFL.
The bulk-fill composites have a higher wear rate and lower hardness than the conventional nanohybrid composite, making them less suitable for stress-bearing restorations.</description><subject>Adhesive wear</subject><subject>Bulk-fill</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Composite resin</subject><subject>Composite Resins</subject><subject>Dental caries</subject><subject>Dental cement</subject><subject>Dental material</subject><subject>Dental Materials</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>Diamonds</subject><subject>Hardness</subject><subject>Hardness measurement</subject><subject>Hybrid composites</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Resins</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Stainless steel</subject><subject>Stainless steels</subject><subject>Tooth wear</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Wear</subject><subject>Wear rate</subject><subject>Wear resistance</subject><subject>Wear tests</subject><issn>0109-5641</issn><issn>1879-0097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6D0QWvXhpzSRp2lwEWfyCBS-Kx5AmU8jabdekFfz3Zln14EHmMJfnfWd4CDkFmgMFebXKHXaDaXNGGeTAcuDVHplCVaqMUlXukykFqrJCCpiQoxhXlFLBFBySCReqZEVFp-T8FU2Y9828Htu3rPFtOw8YfTe3_XrTRz9gPCYHjWkjnnzvGXm5u31ePGTLp_vHxc0ys4LLIeOcV6wyCkGUiok0rqwdCqqkrBtGayyctFXjuHRQGFsgq5wSyiIaA5bzGbnc9W5C_z5iHPTaR4ttazrsx6iZhEIxxpVM6MUfdNWPoUvfJUpUTHIAkSixo2zoYwzY6E3waxM-NVC9dahXeudQbx1qYDo5TLGz7_KxXqP7Df1IS8D1DsBk48Nj0NF67Cw6H9AO2vX-_wtfeHiBtA</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Osiewicz, Magdalena A.</creator><creator>Werner, Arie</creator><creator>Roeters, Franciscus J.M.</creator><creator>Kleverlaan, Cornelis J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Wear of bulk-fill resin composites</title><author>Osiewicz, Magdalena A. ; Werner, Arie ; Roeters, Franciscus J.M. ; Kleverlaan, Cornelis J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-333828a9e147924242d7bde40966bf20be5d6c8fd36d15ac5e28d949ceeaa1c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adhesive wear</topic><topic>Bulk-fill</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Composite resin</topic><topic>Composite Resins</topic><topic>Dental caries</topic><topic>Dental cement</topic><topic>Dental material</topic><topic>Dental Materials</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>Diamonds</topic><topic>Hardness</topic><topic>Hardness measurement</topic><topic>Hybrid composites</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Resins</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Stainless steel</topic><topic>Stainless steels</topic><topic>Tooth wear</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Wear</topic><topic>Wear rate</topic><topic>Wear resistance</topic><topic>Wear tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Osiewicz, Magdalena A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Arie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roeters, Franciscus J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleverlaan, Cornelis J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Dental materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Osiewicz, Magdalena A.</au><au>Werner, Arie</au><au>Roeters, Franciscus J.M.</au><au>Kleverlaan, Cornelis J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wear of bulk-fill resin composites</atitle><jtitle>Dental materials</jtitle><addtitle>Dent Mater</addtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>549</spage><epage>553</epage><pages>549-553</pages><issn>0109-5641</issn><eissn>1879-0097</eissn><abstract>Bulk-fill resin composites are a special group of restorative materials designed to reduce chair time needed to insert a direct composite restoration. However, other factors determine the clinical success of a restorative material. Clinically the major reasons for failure of direct restorations are secondary caries and fracture of the restoration or the tooth itself. In the long-term composite resin restorations in posterior teeth may be prone to wear. As bulk-fill materials have their own composition that will determine their mechanical properties, the wear resistance may be affected as well. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the wear of bulk-fill composites in comparison with a conventional hybrid composite. The null hypothesis was that there are no differences between the four bulk-fill materials and one traditional highly filled nanohybrid composite for posterior use when subjected to a two-body wear rate test and hardness measurement.
Four bulk-fill composites SDR Smart Dentin Replacement (SDR), X-tra base (XBA), FiltekBulk Fill (FUP), Dual-Curing Bulk Composite (FBFL) and conventional nanohybrid resin composite Grandio (GDO) subjected to a two-body wear test against a stainless steel (SS) antagonist wheel. Scanning Electron Microscopy analysis was performed to detect the surface alterations. Microhardness of all samples was tested (n = 5) with a Vickers diamond indenter (5 indentations in each specimen). One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test (P < 0.01) were used to analyze differences in wear values. The hardness data were submitted to one-way ANOVA test, followed by the Tukey post hoc test (α = 0.05). T-test was applied to compare wear rate in time interval between one day and one month.
The highest wear rate values were recorded for SDR and the lowest wear rate values were for GDO. Hardness was the highest for GDO and the lowest for FBFL.
The bulk-fill composites have a higher wear rate and lower hardness than the conventional nanohybrid composite, making them less suitable for stress-bearing restorations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34972580</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.dental.2021.12.138</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0109-5641 |
| ispartof | Dental materials, 2022-03, Vol.38 (3), p.549-553 |
| issn | 0109-5641 1879-0097 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2615922396 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE |
| subjects | Adhesive wear Bulk-fill Composite materials Composite resin Composite Resins Dental caries Dental cement Dental material Dental Materials Dentin Diamonds Hardness Hardness measurement Hybrid composites Materials Testing Mechanical properties Resins Restoration Scanning electron microscopy Stainless steel Stainless steels Tooth wear Variance analysis Wear Wear rate Wear resistance Wear tests |
| title | Wear of bulk-fill resin composites |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T01%3A56%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wear%20of%20bulk-fill%20resin%20composites&rft.jtitle=Dental%20materials&rft.au=Osiewicz,%20Magdalena%20A.&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=549&rft.epage=553&rft.pages=549-553&rft.issn=0109-5641&rft.eissn=1879-0097&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.dental.2021.12.138&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2648263114%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2648263114&rft_id=info:pmid/34972580&rft_els_id=S0109564121004735&rfr_iscdi=true |