Robotic Urethral Reconstruction Outcomes in Men With Posterior Urethral Stenosis

To evaluate surgical outcomes stratified by posterior urethral obstruction (PUO) etiology in men undergoing definitive robotic posterior urethral reconstruction. A retrospective, single surgeon, review of men undergoing robotic posterior urethral reconstruction between 2018 and 2020 was performed. D...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2022-03, Vol.161, p.118-124
Hauptverfasser: Bearrick, Elizabeth N., Findlay, Bridget L., Maciejko, Laura A., Hebert, Kevin J., Anderson, Katherine T., Viers, Boyd R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate surgical outcomes stratified by posterior urethral obstruction (PUO) etiology in men undergoing definitive robotic posterior urethral reconstruction. A retrospective, single surgeon, review of men undergoing robotic posterior urethral reconstruction between 2018 and 2020 was performed. Differences in complications, reconstructive success (no further intervention), and urinary continence by PUO etiology were assessed. Robotic posterior urethral reconstruction was performed in 21 men. PUO etiology included benign prostatic hypertrophy treatment in 5 (24%), prostatectomy in 10 (48%), radiation in 5 (24%), and trauma in 1 (5%). Median number of prior endoscopic treatments was 3 (benign prostatic hypertrophy), 3 (prostatectomy), and 2 (radiation) with an average time between obstruction and reconstruction of 9, 12, and 15 months (P = .52). Median length of stay after reconstruction was 2, 1, and 2 days (P = .45). Thirty-day complications occurred in 0%, 20%, 40% (P = .19). Post-reconstruction re-intervention was necessary in 0%, 10%, 80% (P = .004). Ultimately, anatomic success was achieved in 100%, 90%, 80% (P = .63), with functional success rates of 100%, 100%, 60% (P = .035). Median postoperative pad/day usage was 0,0, 10.5 (P
ISSN:0090-4295
1527-9995
DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2021.11.035