Flap survival and functional outcomes in elbow soft tissue reconstruction: A 25-year systematic review

Different elbow flap reconstructions have been described in the literature. We aim to define the optimal flap technique based on defect size and etiology. A systematic review was undertaken using the terms “(Elbow reconstruction) AND ((Soft tissue) OR (flap))”. Flaps were grouped under fasciocutaneo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2022-03, Vol.75 (3), p.991-1000
Hauptverfasser: Kahramangil, Bora, Pires, Giovanna, Ghaznavi, Amir M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Different elbow flap reconstructions have been described in the literature. We aim to define the optimal flap technique based on defect size and etiology. A systematic review was undertaken using the terms “(Elbow reconstruction) AND ((Soft tissue) OR (flap))”. Flaps were grouped under fasciocutaneous (FCF), muscular (MF), distant pedicled (DPF), and free flaps (FF). The primary outcome was flap survival. The secondary outcomes were postoperative complications and range of motion (pROM). Twenty articles with 224 patients were included. Defect sizes were small (100 cm2) (16%). Etiologies included trauma (26%), burn contractures (26%), infection (26%), hardware coverage (16%), and others (6%). FCF (54%) was the preferred flap followed by MF (28%), DPF (13%), and FF (5%). The rate of flap necrosis was 4% and that of other complications was 10%. The postoperative range of motion (pROM) (reported in 154 patients) was >100°, 50–100°, and
ISSN:1748-6815
1878-0539
DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.091