Flap survival and functional outcomes in elbow soft tissue reconstruction: A 25-year systematic review
Different elbow flap reconstructions have been described in the literature. We aim to define the optimal flap technique based on defect size and etiology. A systematic review was undertaken using the terms “(Elbow reconstruction) AND ((Soft tissue) OR (flap))”. Flaps were grouped under fasciocutaneo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2022-03, Vol.75 (3), p.991-1000 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Different elbow flap reconstructions have been described in the literature. We aim to define the optimal flap technique based on defect size and etiology.
A systematic review was undertaken using the terms “(Elbow reconstruction) AND ((Soft tissue) OR (flap))”. Flaps were grouped under fasciocutaneous (FCF), muscular (MF), distant pedicled (DPF), and free flaps (FF). The primary outcome was flap survival. The secondary outcomes were postoperative complications and range of motion (pROM).
Twenty articles with 224 patients were included. Defect sizes were small (100 cm2) (16%). Etiologies included trauma (26%), burn contractures (26%), infection (26%), hardware coverage (16%), and others (6%). FCF (54%) was the preferred flap followed by MF (28%), DPF (13%), and FF (5%). The rate of flap necrosis was 4% and that of other complications was 10%. The postoperative range of motion (pROM) (reported in 154 patients) was >100°, 50–100°, and |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1748-6815 1878-0539 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.091 |