Carpentier-Edwards Magna Ease bioprosthesis: a multicentre clinical experience and 12-year durability

Abstract OBJECTIVES The goal of this multicentre retrospective study was to compare long-term clinical and haemodynamic outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Magna Ease (CEME) bioprosthesis by patient age. METHODS We included consecutive patients who underwent isolated and combined surgical aortic valv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery 2022-03, Vol.61 (4), p.888-896
Hauptverfasser: Piperata, Antonio, Fiocco, Alessandro, Cavicchiolo, Andrea, Ponzoni, Matteo, Pesce, Rita, Gemelli, Marco, Evangelista, Giuseppe, Gastino, Elisa, Michelotti, Sara, Mazzaro, Enzo, Garufi, Luigi, DePaulis, Ruggero, Zanella, Luca, Nadali, Matteo, Mangino, Domenico, Lorenzoni, Giulia, Gregori, Dario, Jorgji, Vjola, Gerosa, Gino, Bottio, Tomaso
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract OBJECTIVES The goal of this multicentre retrospective study was to compare long-term clinical and haemodynamic outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Magna Ease (CEME) bioprosthesis by patient age. METHODS We included consecutive patients who underwent isolated and combined surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) with CEME valve between January 2008 and March 2020 at 4 cardiac surgery centres in Italy. Survival distribution was evaluated at follow-up according to age and surgery type (combined or isolated AVR), together with freedom from structural valve deterioration (SVD), reoperation and combined events, i.e. SVD, reoperation, endocarditis and thromboembolic events. RESULTS A total of 1027 isolated and 1121 combined AVR were included; 776 patients were younger than 65 years whereas 1372 were 65 years or older. The 30-day Valve-Academic-Research-Consortium mortality was 2% (
ISSN:1010-7940
1873-734X
DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezab552