TERT promoter mutations are associated with longer progression-free and overall survival in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma receiving BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy

Around 50% of cutaneous melanomas harbour therapeutically targetable BRAF V600 mutations. Reliable clinical biomarkers predicting duration of response to BRAF-targeted therapies are still lacking. Recent in vitro studies demonstrated that BRAF-MEK inhibitor therapy response is associated with tumour...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cancer (1990) 2022-01, Vol.161, p.99-107
Hauptverfasser: Thielmann, Carl M., Matull, Johanna, Zaremba, Anne, Murali, Rajmohan, Chorti, Eleftheria, Lodde, Georg, Jansen, Philipp, Herbst, Rudolf, Terheyden, Patrick, Utikal, Jochen, Pföhler, Claudia, Ulrich, Jens, Kreuter, Alexander, Mohr, Peter, Gutzmer, Ralf, Meier, Friedegund, Dippel, Edgar, Weichenthal, Michael, Kretz, Julia, Möller, Inga, Sucker, Antje, Paschen, Annette, Livingstone, Elisabeth, Zimmer, Lisa, Hadaschik, Eva, Ugurel, Selma, Schadendorf, Dirk, Griewank, Klaus G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Around 50% of cutaneous melanomas harbour therapeutically targetable BRAF V600 mutations. Reliable clinical biomarkers predicting duration of response to BRAF-targeted therapies are still lacking. Recent in vitro studies demonstrated that BRAF-MEK inhibitor therapy response is associated with tumour TERT promoter mutation status. We assessed this potential association in a clinical setting. The study cohort comprised 232 patients with metastatic or unresectable BRAF V600-mutated melanoma receiving combined BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment, including a single-centre retrospective discovery cohort (N = 120) and a prospectively collected multicenter validation cohort (N = 112). Patients were excluded if they received BRAF or MEK inhibitors in an adjuvant setting, as monotherapy, or in combination with immunotherapy. Kaplan–Meier and univariate/multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed as appropriate. median age at first diagnosis was 54 years (range 16–84 years). The majority of patients were men 147/232 (63.4%). Most tumours harboured TERT promoter mutations (72%, N = 167). A survival advantage was observed in both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with TERT promoter-mutant versus wild-type tumours in both the discovery cohort (mPFS of 9.6 months [N = 87] vs 5.0 months [N = 33]; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.33–0.96] and mOS of 33.6 months vs 15.0 months; HR = 0.47 [95%CI 0.32–0.70]) as well as the validation cohort (mPFS of 7.3 months [N = 80] vs 5.8 months [N = 32]; HR = 0.67 [95%CI 0.41–1.10] and mOS of 51.1 months vs 15.0 months; HR = 0.33 [95%CI 0.18–0.63]). In the pooled cohort of TERT promoter-mutant (N = 167) versus wild-type (N = 65) tumours, respectively, PFS was 8.9 versus 5.5 months, (HR = 0.62; 95%CI 0.45–0.87; P = 0.004), and OS was 33.6 versus 17.0 months, (HR = 0.51; 95%CI 0.35–0.75, P = 0.0001). In patients with melanoma receiving BRAF/MEK-targeted therapies, TERT promoter mutations are associated with longer survival. If validated in larger studies, TERT promoter mutation status should be included as a predictive biomarker in treatment algorithms for advanced melanoma. •TERT promoter mutations are associated with prolonged progression-free and overall survival in patients receiving MAPKi therapy.•TERT promoter mutations may serve as a biomarker for response to MAPKi ther apy.•In BRAF V600 mutant melanoma patients TERT promoter mutation status may be relevant for deciding
ISSN:0959-8049
1879-0852
DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2021.11.009