Impact of rapid susceptibility testing on antimicrobial therapy and clinical outcomes in Gram-negative bloodstream infections

Abstract Background Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (rAST) has the potential to improve care of bloodstream infections. Objectives The aim of this service evaluation was to assess the impact of rAST on antimicrobial therapy and clinical outcomes in patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infection. Methods A prospective service evaluation was conducted from March 2018 to December 2018. A rAST system (Alfred 60AST) was run Monday–Friday before midday and results were communicated to clinicians on the same day as positive blood culture, with subsequent conventional AST performed. Times to antibiotic therapy and clinical outcomes were compared between rAST and conventional AST. Results One hundred and ninety-one patients with Gram-negative bacteraemia were included (93 in the rapid group and 98 in the conventional group). Aminoglycoside combination therapy was stopped earlier in the rapid group [32 h (0–795) versus 54 h (4–216), P = 0.002]. The median time to optimal antibiotic based on AST results was significantly shorter than that in the conventional group [50 h (10–339) versus 69.5 h (20–872), P = 0.034]. In the subgroup of patients on ineffective empirical antibiotic, time to effective antibiotic was shorter in the rapid group [39.5 h (32–97) versus 57 h (49–83), P = 0.036]. No differences were found in 28 day mortality or length of stay. Conclusions Rapid susceptibility testing resulted in faster discontinuation of aminoglycosides and a shorter time to starting effective and optimal antibiotic when compared with conventional AST results. rAST has potential clinical benefits and points to the need for larger future studies in areas of high antibiotic resistance.