Comparative effectiveness of different treatment modalities for active, moderate‐to‐severe Graves' orbitopathy: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis
To compare the effects of different treatment modalities on active, moderate‐to‐severe Graves' orbitopathy (GO). We searched PubMed and Embase for randomized controlled trials published up to 30 Nov 2020, of different modalities for the treatment of active, moderate‐to‐severe GO. We performed B...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) England), 2022-09, Vol.100 (6), p.e1189-e1198 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To compare the effects of different treatment modalities on active, moderate‐to‐severe Graves' orbitopathy (GO). We searched PubMed and Embase for randomized controlled trials published up to 30 Nov 2020, of different modalities for the treatment of active, moderate‐to‐severe GO. We performed Bayesian network meta‐analyses. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020166287). Fifteen RCTs were identified. Network meta‐analysis showed that in comparison with placebo, teprotumumab, mycophenolate plus intravenous glucocorticoids (IVGCs), mycophenolate, rituximab, azathioprine, IVGCs, orbital radiotherapy, oral glucocorticoids (OGCs) were effective treatments (ordered from most effective to least effective). Teprotumumab was more efficacious in reducing proptosis than IVGCs. No significant difference in changes in diplopia grade was recorded between teprotumumab, rituximab, orbital radiotherapy and IVGCs. Low (4.5–5 g), middle (6 g) and high (7–8 g) cumulative doses of IVGCs were shown to be more effective than OGC in improving the overall response rate, but the very low‐group ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1755-375X 1755-3768 |
DOI: | 10.1111/aos.15074 |