Antigens and their diagnostic performance for Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis: A critical review

Review developing steps were search strategy and article selection, data extraction, analysis and writing. On the analysis, several plots were constructed to compare the antigens. [Display omitted] •Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis is the most aggressive and lethal disease form in dogs.•Accurate, cheap and fast point of care diagnostics are a demand on disease control.•Many antigens have been tested for the development of new high-accuracy diagnosis.•Herein, antigens reported on the last five years were evaluated and compared.•Comparisons considered sensitivity, specificity sample size and sample quality. Canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) is the most aggressive and lethal form of leishmaniasis manifesting in dogs and represents a major public health concern. Although there are sufficiently sensitive molecular tools for CVL diagnosis, they are not accessible at the main points of disease dissemination, in which context serodiagnosis has been used as an alternative tool on the epidemiological control. As an attempt to develop more accurate immunodiagnostic assays, many antigens have been tested over the years, on different platforms. This review aimed to access studies reporting new antigens that can be applied for CVL serodiagnosis. Articles published from January of 2016 to March of 2021 were retrieved from Google Scholar, Science Direct, and PubMed, using “Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis” and “Serodiagnosis” as keywords. In total, 1527 articles were identified, of which 42 were selected based on exclusion factors. Sensitivity, specificity, sample size, and sample quality data were extracted by manual curation and analyzed. Of the selected articles, 26 contemplated ELISA, which enabled a more thorough comparison and a critical review of these studies. Soluble Leishmania Antigens (SLA) and the A2 protein were used as controls in 53.8 and 46.15 % of these articles, respectively, and were evaluated separately; their frequent use was questioned. Subsequently, articles that evaluated other assay platforms, such as immunochromatography, immunosensors, and others, were also reported and evaluated. Finally, data relative to validation studies of commercial kits were briefly discussed. Our results show that there are several antigens with great potential for the development of accurate diagnostic tools, but further testing is required. The critical analysis also brings insights that can be useful for more assertive diagnostic development of more robust tools for CVL s