How does antiseptic mouthwashes against SARS‐COV‐2 affect the bond strength of universal adhesive to enamel?
This study compares the effect of different mouthwashes that have been recommended during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic on shear bond strength (SBS) of universal adhesive to enamel in regards to self‐etch (SE) and etch‐and‐rinse (ER) modes. Flat enamel surfaces were obtained from...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Microscopy research and technique 2022-03, Vol.85 (3), p.1199-1208 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This study compares the effect of different mouthwashes that have been recommended during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic on shear bond strength (SBS) of universal adhesive to enamel in regards to self‐etch (SE) and etch‐and‐rinse (ER) modes. Flat enamel surfaces were obtained from 100 sound human maxillary central incisors. They were randomly allocated to five groups according to the different mouthwashes (no mouthwash/control [Ctrl], 0.2% chlorhexidine 1.5% hydrogen peroxide [H2O2], 0.2% povidone‐iodine [PVP‐I], Listerine [L]), and adhesive application modes (ER and SE) (n = 10). After the application of a universal adhesive (single bond universal), composite resin (Filtek Z250) was bonded by a cylinder‐shaped mold (height: 2 mm, diameter: 2.4 mm). They were subjected to SBS test using a universal testing machine (AGS‐X, Shimadzu Corp.) (crosshead speed: 1 mm/min). The resin–enamel interfaces were observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The semiquantitative chemical microanalyses were performed with energy‐dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The data were statistically analyzed by two‐way analysis of variance and Bonferroni test (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1059-910X 1097-0029 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jemt.24028 |