Influenza D binding properties vary amongst the two major virus clades and wildlife species

•Influenza D has a wide host tropism in both domestic and wild animals despite a very specific receptor preference.•Differences in tissue tropism exist between the two major influenza D clades in water buffalo, Asian elephant, and hedgehog.•Despite positive serosurveillance data, wild Suidae and Cer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary microbiology 2022-01, Vol.264, p.109298-109298, Article 109298
Hauptverfasser: Nemanichvili, Nikoloz, Berends, Alinda J., Tomris, Ilhan, Barnard, Karen N., Parrish, Colin R., Gröne, Andrea, Rijks, Jolianne M., Verheije, Monique H., de Vries, Robert P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Influenza D has a wide host tropism in both domestic and wild animals despite a very specific receptor preference.•Differences in tissue tropism exist between the two major influenza D clades in water buffalo, Asian elephant, and hedgehog.•Despite positive serosurveillance data, wild Suidae and Cervidea do not express influenza D receptors.•Influenza D has potential to spread from domesticated animals to wildlife and vice versa. The influenza D virus (IDV) uses a trimeric hemagglutinin-esterase fusion protein (HEF) for attachment to 9-O-acetylated sialic acid receptors on the cell surface of host species. So far research has revealed that farm animals such as cattle, domestic pigs, goats, sheep and horses contain the necessary receptors on the epithelial surface of the respiratory tract to accommodate binding of the IDV HEF protein of both worldwide clades D/Oklahoma (D/OK) and D/Oklahoma/660 (D/660). More recently, seroprevalence studies have identified IDV-seropositive wildlife such as wild boar, deer, dromedaries, and small ruminants. However, no research has thus far been conducted in wildlife to reveal the distribution of acetylated sialic acid receptors that accommodate binding of IDV. Using our previously developed tissue microarray (TMA) system, we developed TMAs containing respiratory tissues of various wild and domestic species including wild boar, deer, dromedary, springbok, water buffalo, tiger, hedgehog, and Asian elephant. Protein histochemical staining of these TMAs with HEF proteins showed no receptor binding for wild Suidae, Cervidae and tiger. However, receptors were present in dromedary, springbok, water buffalo, Asian elephant, and hedgehog. In contrast to previously tested farm animals, a difference in host tropism was observed between the D/OK and D/660 clade HEF proteins in Asian elephant, and water buffalo. These results show that IDV can attach to the respiratory tract of wildlife which might facilitate transmission of IDV between wildlife and domestic animals.
ISSN:0378-1135
1873-2542
DOI:10.1016/j.vetmic.2021.109298