Impact of a clinical pharmacist in a multidisciplinary consultation on the switch to a biosimilar for inflammatory rheumatic diseases
•A clinical pharmacist consultation can improve the switch to a biosimilar.•A clinical pharmacist consultation does not affect the nocebo effect.•The potential benefit of a pharmacist consultation on the retention of a biosimilar remains to be investigated. Despite several studies proving the effica...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme, 2022-05, Vol.89 (3), p.105322-105322, Article 105322 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •A clinical pharmacist consultation can improve the switch to a biosimilar.•A clinical pharmacist consultation does not affect the nocebo effect.•The potential benefit of a pharmacist consultation on the retention of a biosimilar remains to be investigated.
Despite several studies proving the efficacy and safety of biosimilars compared with original drugs, switching to a biosimilar remains challenging when the decision is at the discretion of physicians with mandatory consent from patients. Educating patients about biosimilars seems important to increase the prescription rate of biosimilars. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a clinical pharmacist consultation on the switch to and retention rate of a biosimilar for patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.
This retrospective study compared 2 groups of adult patients receiving (intervention) or not (control) a consultation with a pharmacist right before the rheumatologist consultation. The primary outcome was the frequency of patients who switched to a biosimilar at the end of the rheumatologist visit.
We analysed 141 patients (50% women, 50±15years old, on original adalimumab (62%) or etanercept (38%)) who had never used biosimilars: 85 in the intervention group and 56 in the control group. The switch rate to a biosimilar significantly differed between the groups: 69.4% versus 41.1% in the intervention group versus the control group respectively (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1297-319X 1778-7254 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jbspin.2021.105322 |