Luting indirect restorations with resin cements versus composite resins: Effects of preheating and ultrasound energy on film thickness
Objective This study aims to evaluate and compare the film thickness obtained with a resin cement and two composite resins, preheated and/or ultrasonically vibrated, as luting agents. Materials and methods One hundred and twenty‐six (126) pairs of resin discs were randomly assigned to six experiment...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry 2022-06, Vol.34 (4), p.641-649 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
This study aims to evaluate and compare the film thickness obtained with a resin cement and two composite resins, preheated and/or ultrasonically vibrated, as luting agents.
Materials and methods
One hundred and twenty‐six (126) pairs of resin discs were randomly assigned to six experimental groups (n = 21) according to luting agent (Variolink Esthetic LC, IPS Empress Direct or Estelite Omega) and cementation technique (preheating at 68°C and/or ultrasonic vibration). Specimens were luted by applying a controlled force. Following sectioning and film thickness measurement through field emission gun scanning electron microscopy, statistical analysis was carried out considering a 5% significance level.
Results
Statistically significant lower film thickness was observed in Variolink Esthetic LC group when compared to all composite resin groups (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1496-4155 1708-8240 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jerd.12851 |