Comparison of deep learning-based emission-only attenuation correction methods for positron emission tomography
Purpose This study aims to compare two approaches using only emission PET data and a convolution neural network (CNN) to correct the attenuation ( μ ) of the annihilation photons in PET. Methods One of the approaches uses a CNN to generate μ -maps from the non-attenuation-corrected (NAC) PET images...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2022-05, Vol.49 (6), p.1833-1842 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
This study aims to compare two approaches using only emission PET data and a convolution neural network (CNN) to correct the attenuation (
μ
) of the annihilation photons in PET.
Methods
One of the approaches uses a CNN to generate
μ
-maps from the non-attenuation-corrected (NAC) PET images (
μ
-CNN
NAC
). In the other method, CNN is used to improve the accuracy of
μ
-maps generated using maximum likelihood estimation of activity and attenuation (MLAA) reconstruction (
μ
-CNN
MLAA
). We investigated the improvement in the CNN performance by combining the two methods (
μ
-CNN
MLAA+NAC
) and the suitability of
μ
-CNN
NAC
for providing the scatter distribution required for MLAA reconstruction. Image data from
18
F-FDG (
n
= 100) or
68
Ga-DOTATOC (
n
= 50) PET/CT scans were used for neural network training and testing.
Results
The error of the attenuation correction factors estimated using
μ
-CT and
μ
-CNN
NAC
was over 7%, but that of scatter estimates was only 2.5%, indicating the validity of the scatter estimation from
μ
-CNN
NAC
. However, CNN
NAC
provided less accurate bone structures in the
μ
-maps, while the best results in recovering the fine bone structures were obtained by applying CNN
MLAA+NAC
. Additionally, the
μ
-values in the lungs were overestimated by CNN
NAC
. Activity images (
λ
) corrected for attenuation using
μ
-CNN
MLAA
and
μ
-CNN
MLAA+NAC
were superior to those corrected using
μ
-CNN
NAC
, in terms of their similarity to
λ
-CT. However, the improvement in the similarity with
λ
-CT by combining the CNN
NAC
and CNN
MLAA
approaches was insignificant (percent error for lung cancer lesions,
λ
-CNN
NAC
= 5.45% ± 7.88%;
λ
-CNN
MLAA
= 1.21% ± 5.74%;
λ
-CNN
MLAA+NAC
= 1.91% ± 4.78%; percent error for bone cancer lesions,
λ
-CNN
NAC
= 1.37% ± 5.16%;
λ
-CNN
MLAA
= 0.23% ± 3.81%;
λ
-CNN
MLAA+NAC
= 0.05% ± 3.49%).
Conclusion
The use of CNN
NAC
was feasible for scatter estimation to address the chicken-egg dilemma in MLAA reconstruction, but CNN
MLAA
outperformed CNN
NAC. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1619-7070 1619-7089 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00259-021-05637-0 |