Diurnal variation in DLCO and non-standardized study procedures may cause a false positive safety signal in clinical trials

Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was measured in a phase I single ascending dose study after inhalation of AZD8154 or placebo in healthy participants at baseline (DLCOBaseline) and follow-up (DLCOFollow-up) 6 days after dosing. Initially, DLCOFollow-up timepoint was 2 h earlier than the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory medicine 2022-01, Vol.191, p.106705-106705, Article 106705
Hauptverfasser: Kirla, Krishna Tulasi, Nemes, Szilárd, Betts, Joanne, Kristensson, Cecilia, Mo, John, Asimus, Sara, Sadiq, Muhammad Waqas, Redlich, Elke, Koernicke, Thomas, Fuhr, Rainard, Brailsford, Wayne, Keen, Christina, Hagberg, Anette, Mäenpää, Jukka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was measured in a phase I single ascending dose study after inhalation of AZD8154 or placebo in healthy participants at baseline (DLCOBaseline) and follow-up (DLCOFollow-up) 6 days after dosing. Initially, DLCOFollow-up timepoint was 2 h earlier than the DLCOBaseline timepoint and clinically significant decreases in DLCOFollow-up (absolute change up to 19% from baseline and DLCO%predicted values less than 70) were observed then. The observed reduction in DLCOFollow-up was confirmed as a false positive finding after alignment of DLCO timings. As a consequence, when DLCO is used in clinical studies, measurements should be strictly standardized in relation to time of the day. •DLCO measurements might be affected by various factors in healthy volunteers.•Measuring DLCO at different timings of a day led to significant decreased values.•Factors affecting cardiac output should be standardized at each DLCO timepoint.
ISSN:0954-6111
1532-3064
DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106705