Marginal resection for patients with atypical lipomatous tumours of the extremities and trunk wall: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background This systematic review assessed and compared the efficacy of marginal resection to wide resection in patients with atypical lipomatous tumours (ALT) by evaluating the local recurrence rates, overall survival and adverse event rates. Methods We evaluated studies published between...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Japanese journal of clinical oncology 2022-02, Vol.52 (2), p.151-156
Hauptverfasser: Kido, Akira, Kitagawa, Yasuyuki, Tsukushi, Satoshi, Iwata, Shintaro, Ishida, Yukako, Tsukamoto, Shinji, Kawai, Akira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background This systematic review assessed and compared the efficacy of marginal resection to wide resection in patients with atypical lipomatous tumours (ALT) by evaluating the local recurrence rates, overall survival and adverse event rates. Methods We evaluated studies published between 1 January 1990 and 31 January 2019. The risks of bias in the selected studies were analyzed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool. The quality of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Results Three case–control studies and three case series studies were identified. A meta-analysis was performed of six studies to evaluate the local recurrence rate after resection. Comparison of marginal and wide resections showed that the local recurrence rate was not significantly higher in the marginal resection group (14.2 and 1.4%, odds ratio: 2.88, 95% confidence interval 0.99–8.33, P = 0.05). We observed no difference in overall survival. In one study, the rates of adverse events were 14.7% in the marginal resection group and 45.4% in the wide treatment group (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval 0.11–80.91, P 
ISSN:1465-3621
1465-3621
DOI:10.1093/jjco/hyab185