Post-Operative Outcomes Associated With Open Versus Robotic Thymectomy: A Propensity Matched Analysis

To compare post-operative outcomes associated with thymectomy performed using either open or robotic approaches. Retrospective cohort study from a single-center prospective registry consisting of patients undergoing thymectomy between 2000 and 2020. Patients were grouped according to surgical approach (open vs robotic). A propensity-score matching analysis was performed in a 2:1 open to robotic ratio, and surgical outcomes were evaluated. We analyzed 234 thymectomies (155 open; 79 robotic). Myasthenia gravis was present in 23.2% and 32.9% (P = 0.249) in the open and in the robotic group, respectively. All covariates were balanced in the matched groups (open n = 114; robotic n =5 9), except lesion size. The robotic approach was significantly associated with shorter surgical time (median 95 vs 65 minutes, P < 0.001), lesser clinical (21.1% vs 6.8%, P = 0.016) and surgical (11.4% vs 1.7%, P = 0.036) complications during the same hospitalization, less Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or higher complication rates (28.1 vs 15.3%, P = 0.048), chest tube duration (median: 3 vs 0 days, P < 0.001) and in-hospital length of stay (median: 5 vs 0 days, P < 0.001). Bleeding (P = 0.214), ICU length of stay (P = 0.167), reoperation rate (open, 1.8% vs robotic 0%), 90-day mortality (P = 0.341) and readmission rate post discharge (P = 0.277) were similar between the groups. In the matched population with primary thymic epithelial tumors, the completeness of resection rate was similar (open, 92.1% vs robotic 96.8%, P = 0.66.). Robotic thymectomy is associated with improved post-operative outcomes when compared to open thymectomy, without compromising the goals of oncologic surgery. Longer follow-up is needed to ensure oncologic equivalence. [Display omitted]