Differences in lesion interpretation between radiologists in two countries: Lessons from a digital breast tomosynthesis training test set

Introduction In many western countries, there is good evidence documenting the performance of radiologists reading digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images. However, the diagnostic efficiency of Chinese radiologists using DBT, particularly type of errors being made and type of cancers being missed,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology 2022-08, Vol.18 (4), p.441-447
Hauptverfasser: Li, Tong, Gandomkar, Ziba, Trieu, Phuong Dung (Yun), Lewis, Sarah J., Brennan, Patrick C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction In many western countries, there is good evidence documenting the performance of radiologists reading digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images. However, the diagnostic efficiency of Chinese radiologists using DBT, particularly type of errors being made and type of cancers being missed, is understudied. This study aims to investigate the pattern of diagnostic errors across different lesion types produced by Chinese radiologists diagnosing from DBT images. Australian radiologists will be used as a benchmark. Methods Twelve Chinese radiologists read a DBT test set and located each perceived cancer lesion. True positives, false positives (FP), true negatives and false negatives (FN) were generated. The same test set was also read by 14 Australian radiologists. Z‐scores and Pearson correlations were used to compare interpretation of lesions and identification of normal appearances between two groups of radiologists. Results Architectural distortions (p 
ISSN:1743-7555
1743-7563
DOI:10.1111/ajco.13686