Quantification of chronic aortic regurgitation using left and right ventricular stroke volumes obtained from two new automated three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic software: feasibility and accuracy

The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of chronic aortic regurgitation (CAR) quantification using left and right ventricular stroke volumes (LVSV and RVSV, respectively) obtained from two new automated three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic software—Dynamic Heart...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The international journal of cardiovascular imaging 2022-04, Vol.38 (4), p.789-799
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Bing, Wang, Han, Meng, Qinglong, Tao, Jia, Lu, Hongquan, Wu, Weichun, Zhu, Zhenhui, Wang, Hao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of chronic aortic regurgitation (CAR) quantification using left and right ventricular stroke volumes (LVSV and RVSV, respectively) obtained from two new automated three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic software—Dynamic HeartModel (DHM) and 3D Auto RV. Patients (n=116) with more than mild isolated CAR were included and divided into two groups: central (n=53) and eccentric CAR (n=63) groups. LVSV and RVSV were automatically measured by DHM and 3D Auto RV. Next, aortic regurgitant volume (ARVol) was calculated three ways: as the difference between LVSV and RVSV, by the two-dimensional proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method, and using effective regurgitant orifice area derived from real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) multiplied by CAR velocity time integral (the reference standard). DHM plus 3D Auto RV correlated well with RT3DE in ARVol measurement in both groups (central, r  = 0.90; eccentric, r  = 0.96), with no significant difference based on consistency analysis. In the eccentric group, PISA led to an obvious underestimation (mean difference= − 4.20 ml, P 
ISSN:1875-8312
1569-5794
1875-8312
1573-0743
DOI:10.1007/s10554-021-02471-1