Outcome-selective reinstatement is predominantly context-independent, and associated with c-Fos activation in the posterior dorsomedial striatum

•Outcome-selective reinstatement is predominantly context-independent.•Outcome-selective reinstatement is entirely context-independent after multiple extinction sessions.•Outcome-selective reinstatement increases c-Fos expression in dorsomedial striatum.•c-Fos expression in orbitofrontal cortex and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurobiology of learning and memory 2022-01, Vol.187, p.107556-107556, Article 107556
Hauptverfasser: Abiero, Arvie R., Ali, Zaid, Vissel, Bryce, Bradfield, Laura A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Outcome-selective reinstatement is predominantly context-independent.•Outcome-selective reinstatement is entirely context-independent after multiple extinction sessions.•Outcome-selective reinstatement increases c-Fos expression in dorsomedial striatum.•c-Fos expression in orbitofrontal cortex and dorsal hippocampus is unaffected by selective reinstatement. Research from human and animal studies has found that after responding has been successfully reduced following treatment it can return upon exposure to certain contexts. An individual in recovery from alcohol use disorder, for example, might relapse to drinking upon visiting their favourite bar. However, most of these data have been derived from experiments involving a single (active) response, and the context-dependence of returned responding in situations involving choice between multiple actions and outcomes is less well-understood. We thus investigated how outcome-selective reinstatement – a procedure involving choice between two actions and outcomes – was affected by altering the physical context in rats. In Experiment 1, rats were trained over 6 days to press a left lever for one food outcome (pellets or sucrose) and a right lever for the other outcome. Then, rats received an extinction session in either the same context (A) as lever press training, or in a different context (B). Rats were tested immediately (5 min) after extinction in Context A or B such that there were four groups in total: AAA, ABB, ABA, and AAB. Reinstatement testing consisted of one food outcome being delivered ‘freely’ (i.e. unearned by lever pressing and unsignalled by cues) to the food magazine every 4 min in the following order: Sucrose, Pellet, Pellet, Sucrose. Selective reinstatement was considered intact if pellet delivery increased pressing selectively on the pellet lever, and sucrose delivery selectively increased pressing on the sucrose lever. This result (Reinstated > Nonreinstated) was observed for rats in group AAA and ABB, but not rats in groups ABA and AAB. Experiment 2 was conducted identically, except that rats received two extinction sessions over two days and tested one day later. This time, all groups demonstrated intact outcome-selective reinstatement regardless of context. Analysis of c-Fos expression in several brain regions revealed that only c-Fos expression in the posterior dorsomedial striatum (pDMS) was related to intact reinstatement performance. Overall, these results suggest that outcome-select
ISSN:1074-7427
1095-9564
DOI:10.1016/j.nlm.2021.107556