Sex differences in the coronary vascular response to combined chemoreflex and metaboreflex stimulation in healthy humans

New Findings What is the central question of this study? Coronary blood flow in healthy humans is controlled by both local metabolic signalling and adrenergic activity: does the integration of these signals during acute hypoxia and adrenergic activation differ between sexes? What are the main findings and its importance? Both males and females exhibit an increase in coronary blood velocity in response to acute hypoxia, a response that is constrained by adrenergic stimulation in males but not females. These findings suggest that coronary blood flow control differs between males and females. Coronary hyperaemia is mediated through multiple signalling pathways, including local metabolic messengers and adrenergic stimulation. This study aimed to determine whether the coronary vascular response to adrenergic stressors is different between sexes in normoxia and hypoxia. Young, healthy participants (n = 32; 16F) underwent three randomized trials of isometric handgrip exercise followed by post‐exercise circulatory occlusion (PECO) to activate the muscle metaboreflex. End‐tidal PO2 was controlled at (1) normoxic levels throughout the trial, (2) 50 mmHg for the duration of the trial (hypoxia trial), or (3) 50 mmHg only during PECO (mixed trial). Mean left anterior descending coronary artery velocity (LADVmean; transthoracic Doppler echocardiography), heart rate and blood pressure were assessed at baseline and during PECO. In normoxia, there was no change in LADVmean or cardiac workload induced by PECO in males and females. Acute hypoxia increased baseline LADVmean to a greater extent in males compared with females (P