Optimal mechanical force‐velocity profile for sprint acceleration performance

The aim was to determine the respective influences of sprinting maximal power output (PHmax) and mechanical Force‐velocity (F‐v) profile (ie, ratio between horizontal force production capacities at low and high velocities) on sprint acceleration performance. A macroscopic biomechanical model using a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports 2022-03, Vol.32 (3), p.559-575
Hauptverfasser: Samozino, Pierre, Peyrot, Nicolas, Edouard, Pascal, Nagahara, Ryu, Jimenez‐Reyes, Pedro, Vanwanseele, Benedicte, Morin, Jean‐Benoit
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim was to determine the respective influences of sprinting maximal power output (PHmax) and mechanical Force‐velocity (F‐v) profile (ie, ratio between horizontal force production capacities at low and high velocities) on sprint acceleration performance. A macroscopic biomechanical model using an inverse dynamics approach applied to the athlete's center of mass during running acceleration was developed to express the time to cover a given distance as a mathematical function of PHmax and F‐v profile. Simulations showed that sprint acceleration performance depends mainly on PHmax, but also on the F‐v profile, with the existence of an individual optimal F‐v profile corresponding, for a given PHmax, to the best balance between force production capacities at low and high velocities. This individual optimal profile depends on PHmax and sprint distance: the lower the sprint distance, the more the optimal F‐v profile is oriented to force capabilities and vice versa. When applying this model to the data of 231 athletes from very different sports, differences between optimal and actual F‐v profile were observed and depend more on the variability in the optimal F‐v profile between sprint distances than on the interindividual variability in F‐v profiles. For a given sprint distance, acceleration performance (
ISSN:0905-7188
1600-0838
DOI:10.1111/sms.14097