The role of voice rest after micro-laryngeal surgery for benign vocal fold lesions

Purpose To compare post-operative vocal outcomes of a voice rest regimen versus no voice restrictions following micro-laryngeal surgery for benign glottic lesions. Methods This was a combined prospective and retrospective cohort study on 167 patients who underwent micro-laryngeal surgery for benign focal fold lesion removal. Participants were divided into two regimens: standard voice rest ( n = 92) or no voice restriction ( n = 75). The primary outcome was post-operative vocal improvement, evaluated using voice handicap index questionnaire (VHI-10), GRBAS scale, and computerised acoustic analysis (shimmer, jitter, and the harmonic-to-noise ratio). The secondary outcome was emergence of vocal fold mucosal abnormalities in the immediate post-operative period. Parameters were collected at baseline and at the last clinical visit. Results There was no statistically significant difference between the voice rest and no-voice rest groups regarding baseline parameters of age, gender, laryngeal pathology, and voice use. Improvement in GRBAS scale values and VHI-10 scores between pre- and post-operative periods between groups did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences ( P = 0.5303 and P = 0.1457, respectively). Similarly, the results of computerized voice analysis also showed no differences between groups in terms of shimmer ( P = 0.9590), jitter ( P = 0.5692), and harmonic-to-noise ratio ( P = 0.1871). No correlation was found between the post-operative vocal fold’s mucosal abnormalities and the type of voice rest regimen. Conclusion Voice quality and wound healing were similar regardless of the type of voice rest regimen applied. No voice rest at all was as good as voice rest after micro-laryngeal surgery.