Biochar and its manure-based feedstock have divergent effects on soil organic carbon and greenhouse gas emissions in croplands

Applying organic amendments to soil can increase soil organic carbon (SOC) storage and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated by agriculture, helping to mitigate climate change. However, it is necessary to determine which type of amendment produces the most desirable results. We conducted a 3-y field study comparing one-time addition of manure compost and its biochar derivative to a control to assess their effects on SOC and GHG emissions at ten annually cropped sites in central Alberta, Canada. Manure compost and biochar were applied at equivalent carbon rates (7 Mg ha−1) and tilled into the surface 10 cm of soil. Two years post-treatment, biochar addition increased surface (0–10 cm) SOC by 12 and 10 Mg ha−1 relative to the control and manure addition, respectively. Therefore, biochar addition led to the sequestration of SOC at a rate of 2.5 Mg ha−1 y−1 relative to the control. No treatment effect on deeper (10–100 cm) or cumulative SOC was found. In 2018 and 2019, manure addition increased cumulative GHG (sum of CO2, CH4, and N2O) emissions by 33%, on average, due to greater CO2 emissions relative to both the control and biochar addition. In contrast, in 2020, biochar addition reduced cumulative GHG emissions by an average of 21% due to lower CO2 emissions relative to both the control and manure addition. Our study shows that the application of biochar, rather than its manure compost feedstock, increased surface SOC sequestration and had either no effect on (first two years) or reduced GHG emissions (year three) relative to the control. We recommend that policy and carbon sequestration initiatives focus on optimizing biochar production-application systems to fully realize the potential of biochar application as a viable climate change mitigation practice in agriculture. [Display omitted] •Biochar (BT) was produced from manure compost (MT) for cropland application.•BT, MT, and control (CT) treatments were compared during a 3-y field study.•MT increased annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 34% relative to BT.•Annual GHG emissions were 19% lower in BT than in CT in year three.•BT increased soil organic carbon sequestration by 2.5 Mg ha−1 y−1 relative to CT.