Interpretable machine learning applied to on‐farm biosecurity and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus

Effective biosecurity practices in swine production are key in preventing the introduction and dissemination of infectious pathogens. Ideally, on‐farm biosecurity practices should be chosen by their impact on bio‐containment and bio‐exclusion; however, quantitative supporting evidence is often unava...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transboundary and emerging diseases 2022-07, Vol.69 (4), p.e916-e930
Hauptverfasser: Sykes, Abagael L., Silva, Gustavo S., Holtkamp, Derald J., Mauch, Broc W., Osemeke, Onyekachukwu, Linhares, Daniel C.L., Machado, Gustavo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Effective biosecurity practices in swine production are key in preventing the introduction and dissemination of infectious pathogens. Ideally, on‐farm biosecurity practices should be chosen by their impact on bio‐containment and bio‐exclusion; however, quantitative supporting evidence is often unavailable. Therefore, the development of methodologies capable of quantifying and ranking biosecurity practices according to their efficacy in reducing disease risk has the potential to facilitate better‐informed choices of biosecurity practices. Using survey data on biosecurity practices, farm demographics, and previous outbreaks from 139 herds, a set of machine learning algorithms were trained to classify farms by porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus status, depending on their biosecurity practices and farm demographics, to produce a predicted outbreak risk. A novel interpretable machine learning toolkit, MrIML‐biosecurity, was developed to benchmark farms and production systems by predicted risk and quantify the impact of biosecurity practices on disease risk at individual farms. By quantifying the variable impact on predicted risk, 50% of 42 variables were associated with fomite spread while 31% were associated with local transmission. Results from machine learning interpretations identified similar results, finding substantial contribution to predicted outbreak risk from biosecurity practices relating to the turnover and number of employees, the surrounding density of swine premises and pigs, the sharing of haul trailers, distance from the public road and farm production type. In addition, the development of individualized biosecurity assessments provides the opportunity to better guide biosecurity implementation on a case‐by‐case basis. Finally, the flexibility of the MrIML‐biosecurity toolkit gives it the potential to be applied to wider areas of biosecurity benchmarking, to address biosecurity weaknesses in other livestock systems and industry‐relevant diseases.
ISSN:1865-1674
1865-1682
DOI:10.1111/tbed.14369