Apps and gaps in bipolar disorder: A systematic review on electronic monitoring for episode prediction

•The availability of smartphones has sparked the development of automated applications to remotely monitor patients.•Models were better in predicting (hypo)manic episodes, but their performance varied widely.•Predicting mood episodes in bipolar disorder remains a challenging task. Long-term clinical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of affective disorders 2021-12, Vol.295, p.1190-1200
Hauptverfasser: Ortiz, Abigail, Maslej, Marta M., Husain, M. Ishrat, Daskalakis, Zafiris J., Mulsant, Benoit H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•The availability of smartphones has sparked the development of automated applications to remotely monitor patients.•Models were better in predicting (hypo)manic episodes, but their performance varied widely.•Predicting mood episodes in bipolar disorder remains a challenging task. Long-term clinical monitoring in bipolar disorder (BD) is an important therapeutic tool. The availability of smartphones and wearables has sparked the development of automated applications to remotely monitor patients. This systematic review focus on the current state of electronic (e-) monitoring for episode prediction in BD. We systematically reviewed the literature on e-monitoring for episode prediction in adult BD patients. The systematic review was done according to the guidelines for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and was registered in PROSPERO on April 29, 2020 (CRD42020155795). We conducted a search of Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO (all 2000–2020) databases. We identified and extracted data from 17 published reports on 15 relevant studies. Studies were heterogeneous and most had substantial methodological and technical limitations. Models varied widely in their performance. Published metrics were too heterogeneous to lend themselves to a meta-analysis. Four studies reported sensitivity (range: 0.21 - 0.95); and two reported specificity for prediction of mood episodes (range: 0.36 - 0.99). Two studies reported accuracy (range: 0.64 - 0.88) and four reported area under the curve (AUC; range: 0.52-0.95). Overall, models were better in predicting manic or hypomanic episodes, but their performance depended on feature type. Our conclusions are tempered by the lack of appropriate information impeding our ability to synthesize the available evidence. Given the clinical variability in BD, predicting mood episodes remains a challenging task. Emerging e-monitoring technology for episode prediction in BD requires more development before it can be adopted clinically.
ISSN:0165-0327
1573-2517
DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.140