Multiple platelet-rich plasma injections are superior to single PRP injections or saline in osteoarthritis of the knee: the 2-year results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Introduction The primary purposes of this study were to prove the efficacy of PRP injection therapy on knee pain and functions by comparing patients with mild to moderate OA with a placebo control group, and also to understand the effectiveness of multiple doses compared to a single dose. It was hyp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2022-10, Vol.142 (10), p.2755-2768
Hauptverfasser: Yurtbay, Alparslan, Say, Ferhat, Çinka, Hikmet, Ersoy, Ahmet
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction The primary purposes of this study were to prove the efficacy of PRP injection therapy on knee pain and functions by comparing patients with mild to moderate OA with a placebo control group, and also to understand the effectiveness of multiple doses compared to a single dose. It was hypothesized that PRP would lead to more favorable results than the placebo at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment. Materials and methods 237 patients diagnosed with OA were randomly separated into 4 groups, who were administered the following: single dose of PRP ( n : 62), single dose of sodium saline (NS) ( n : 59), three doses of PRP ( n : 63), and three doses of NS ( n : 53). Clinical evaluations were made pre-treatment and at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-treatment, using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Result Score (KOOS), Kujala Patellofemoral Score, knee joint range of motion (ROM), measurements of knee circumference (KC), and mechanical axis angle (MAA) and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for the evaluation of pain. Results The better score values in the groups were recorded at 3 and 6 months. Patients treated with PRP maintained better scores at 3, 6 and 12 months compared to the NS groups ( p  
ISSN:1434-3916
0936-8051
1434-3916
DOI:10.1007/s00402-021-04230-2