Elevation Transposition Method for Superficialization of the Basilic Vein Achieves Better Patency Rate than Tunnel Transposition
•Elevation transposition has higher primary patency rate than tunnel transposition•Elevation transposition also has shorter surgical time, lesser blood loss, and shorter hospitalization•Both methods had similar primary-assisted patency rate To compare the tunnel transposition and elevation transposi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of vascular surgery 2022-03, Vol.80, p.113-119 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Elevation transposition has higher primary patency rate than tunnel transposition•Elevation transposition also has shorter surgical time, lesser blood loss, and shorter hospitalization•Both methods had similar primary-assisted patency rate
To compare the tunnel transposition and elevation transposition methods used for superficialization of the basilic vein in terms of complication and patency rates.
This retrospective study included patients who underwent 2-stage basilic vein transposition between August 2016 and December 2019. Patients were categorized into brachial-basilic fistula tunnel transposition (n = 32) and elevation transposition (n = 21) groups using medical records. Primary patency was defined as a conduit that remains patent without any re-intervention to maintain patency. Primary assisted patency was defined as a conduit that has undergone intervention to maintain patency but has never been thrombosed.
The distribution of baseline characteristics was similar between the 2 groups. Coronary artery disease was the only variable that was significantly different between the tunnel transposition and elevation transposition groups (31.1% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.035). The tunnel transposition group had a greater amount of blood loss (P < 0.001) and a longer period of hospitalization (P = 0.002) than the elevation transposition group. The rates of suture repair to stop bleeding from the conduit was significantly different between the tunnel transposition and elevation transposition groups (31.8% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.035), whereas those of other complications were not significantly different. The elevation transposition group had a significantly higher primary patency rate than the tunneled transposition group (P = 0.033); however, primary assisted patency was achieved in all patients (100%) in both groups.
Elevation transposition might be a more reliable method than tunnel transposition for superficialization of a basilic venous fistula. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0890-5096 1615-5947 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.08.030 |