Identifying Unexpected Deaths in Long-Term Care Homes

Predicting unexpected deaths among long-term care (LTC) residents can provide valuable information to clinicians and policy makers. We study multiple methods to predict unexpected death, adjusting for individual and home-level factors, and to use as a step to compare mortality differences at the fac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2022-08, Vol.23 (8), p.1431.e21-1431.e28
Hauptverfasser: Rangrej, Jagadish, Kaufman, Sam, Wang, Sping, Kerem, Aidin, Hirdes, John, Hillmer, Michael P., Malikov, Kamil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Predicting unexpected deaths among long-term care (LTC) residents can provide valuable information to clinicians and policy makers. We study multiple methods to predict unexpected death, adjusting for individual and home-level factors, and to use as a step to compare mortality differences at the facility level in the future work. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set assessment data for all LTC residents in Ontario, Canada, from April 2017 to March 2018. All residents in Ontario long-term homes. We used data routinely collected as part of administrative reporting by health care providers to the funder: Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. This project is a component of routine policy development to ensure safety of the LTC system residents. Logistic regression (LR), mixed-effect LR (mixLR), and a machine learning algorithm (XGBoost) were used to predict individual mortality over 5 to 95 days after the last available RAI assessment. We identified 22,419 deaths in the cohort of 106,366 cases (mean age: 83.1 years; female: 67.7%; dementia: 68.8%; functional decline: 16.6%). XGBoost had superior calibration and discrimination (C-statistic 0.837) over both mixLR (0.819) and LR (0.813). The models had high correlation in predicting death (LR-mixLR: 0.979, LR-XGBoost: 0.885, mixLR-XGBoost: 0.882). The inter-rater reliability between the models LR-mixLR and LR-XGBoost was 0.56 and 0.84, respectively. Using results in which all 3 models predicted probability of actual death of a resident at
ISSN:1525-8610
1538-9375
DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2021.09.025