Interpregnancy interval and prevalence of selected birth defects: A multistate study

Background Both short and long interpregnancy intervals (IPIs) have been associated with adverse birth outcomes. We undertook a multistate study to describe the prevalence of selected birth defects by IPI. Methods We obtained data from nine population‐based state birth defects registries for singlet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Birth defects research 2022-01, Vol.114 (2), p.69-79
Hauptverfasser: Liberman, Rebecca F., Heinke, Dominique, Petersen, Julie M., Parker, Samantha E., Nestoridi, Eirini, Van Zutphen, Alissa R., Nembhard, Wendy N., Ramirez, Glenda M., Ethen, Mary K., Tran, Tri, Kirby, Russell S., Getz, Kelly D., Nance, Amy E., Yazdy, Mahsa M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Both short and long interpregnancy intervals (IPIs) have been associated with adverse birth outcomes. We undertook a multistate study to describe the prevalence of selected birth defects by IPI. Methods We obtained data from nine population‐based state birth defects registries for singleton live births in 2000–2009 among mothers with a previous live birth identified through birth certificates. IPI was calculated as the difference between prior birthdate and start of the current pregnancy (conception date). We estimated prevalence of selected defects per 10,000 live births and prevalence ratios (PRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) overall and stratified by maternal age at previous birth and race/ethnicity. Primary analyses focused on short IPI 
ISSN:2472-1727
2472-1727
DOI:10.1002/bdr2.1960