Optimal delineation of the clinical target volume for thymomas in the post-resection setting: A multi-center study
•The optimal postoperative clinical target volume in thymomas is not well-defined yet.•Significant inter-specialty variability exists in volume delineation of thymomas.•Collaboration of a surgeon with a radiation oncologist could improve delineations.•Delineation of post-operative thymoma volumes sh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiotherapy and oncology 2021-12, Vol.165, p.8-13 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •The optimal postoperative clinical target volume in thymomas is not well-defined yet.•Significant inter-specialty variability exists in volume delineation of thymomas.•Collaboration of a surgeon with a radiation oncologist could improve delineations.•Delineation of post-operative thymoma volumes should be performed multidisciplinary.
The definition of the clinical target volume (CTV) for post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) for thymoma is largely unexplored. The aim of this study was to analyze the difference in CTV delineation between radiation oncologists (RTO) and surgeons.
This retrospective multi-center study enrolled 31 patients who underwent PORT for a thymoma from five hospitals. Three CTVs were delineated per patient: one CTV by the RTO, one CTV by the surgeon (blinded to the results of the RTO) and a joint CTV after collaboration. Volumes (cm3), Hausdorff distances (HD) and Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) were analyzed.
RTO delineated significantly bigger CTVs than surgeons (mean: 93.9 ± 63.1, versus 57.9 ± 61.3 cm3, p = 0.003). Agreement was poor between RO and surgeons, with a low mean DSC (0.34 ± 0.21) and high mean HD of 4.5 (±2.2) cm. Collaborative delineation resulted in significantly smaller volumes compared to RTO (mean 57.1 ± 58.6 cm3, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-8140 1879-0887 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.10.007 |