Cost‐effectiveness of exergaming compared to regular day‐care activities in dementia: Results of a randomised controlled trial in The Netherlands

The growing number of people living with dementia will result in increased costs of dementia worldwide. The e‐Health intervention ‘Exergaming’ may improve health and quality of life of people with dementia, but the cost‐effectiveness is unknown. We assessed the cost‐effectiveness of exergaming compa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health & social care in the community 2022-09, Vol.30 (5), p.e1794-e1804
Hauptverfasser: Santen, Joeke, Meiland, Franka J. M., Dröes, Rose‐Marie, Straten, Annemieke, Bosmans, Judith E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The growing number of people living with dementia will result in increased costs of dementia worldwide. The e‐Health intervention ‘Exergaming’ may improve health and quality of life of people with dementia, but the cost‐effectiveness is unknown. We assessed the cost‐effectiveness of exergaming compared to regular activities from a societal perspective in day‐care centres (DCC) for people with dementia and their informal caregivers (IC) alongside a cluster randomised controlled trial. We included 112 dyads (person with dementia and IC) from 20 psychogeriatric DCCs (11 exergaming, 9 control) across the Netherlands. Exergaming consisted of interactive cycling at least twice a week for 6 months. Measurements were conducted at baseline (T0), after 3 (T1) and 6 (T2) months. Primary outcomes were minutes of physical activity, mobility of the participants with dementia (Short Physical Performances Battery, SPPB), and Quality‐Adjusted Life‐Years (QALYs) of participants with dementia and ICs. ICs filled out cost diaries to measure healthcare and informal care utilisation during the study. There were no statistically significant differences in outcomes or costs between the groups at the level of participants with dementia, the ICs or the dyad. With regard to QALYs and SPPB, the probability that exergaming is cost‐effective compared to control was low for all possible willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) thresholds. However, for physical activity at WTP thresholds of 0, 50 and 250 Euros per additional minute of physical activity, the probability of cost‐effectiveness is 0.46, 0.84 and 0.87, respectively. Exergaming in DCC was not cost‐effective compared to usual activities. However, considering the small sample size and the large number of missing observations, findings should be interpreted with caution. Future studies with larger samples are recommended to obtain definitive answers on the cost‐effectiveness of exergaming. This trial was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR5537/NL5420).
ISSN:0966-0410
1365-2524
DOI:10.1111/hsc.13608