Predictors of length of treatment, discharge reason, and re‐admission to Aboriginal alcohol and other drug residential rehabilitation services in New South Wales, Australia

Introduction Aboriginal clients accessing Aboriginal community‐controlled residential alcohol and other drug rehabilitation services in New South Wales, Australia believe they have better outcomes due to culturally appropriate care. However, there is a paucity of published treatment outcome data. Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Drug and alcohol review 2022-03, Vol.41 (3), p.603-615
Hauptverfasser: James, Doug B., Lee, K. S. Kylie, Dronavalli, Mithilesh, Courtney, Ryan J., Conigrave, Katherine M., Conigrave, James H., Shakeshaft, Anthony
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Aboriginal clients accessing Aboriginal community‐controlled residential alcohol and other drug rehabilitation services in New South Wales, Australia believe they have better outcomes due to culturally appropriate care. However, there is a paucity of published treatment outcome data. This study aims to identify predictors of treatment outcomes based on client characteristics at intake. Methods A cross‐sectional, retrospective, observational study of 2326 admissions to six services between January 2011 and December 2016. The outcomes were: (i) leaving treatment early; (ii) self‐discharge or house discharge (by staff); and (iii) re‐admission within two years. The predictors examined were Aboriginal status, age, justice system referral and primary substance of concern. Competing risk and Poisson regression analyses were used to identify trends in the data. Results The mean age of clients was 33 years, and the majority (56%) stayed at least 6 weeks. Aboriginal clients whose primary substance of concern was stimulants were almost eight times more likely to re‐admitted within 2 years than other clients (risk ratio 7.91; P 
ISSN:0959-5236
1465-3362
1465-3362
DOI:10.1111/dar.13388