Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy in super obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are safe procedures that may present sub-optimal results in superobesity (SO). A meta-analysis was pe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Obesity surgery 2022-01, Vol.32 (1), p.170-185 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are safe procedures that may present sub-optimal results in superobesity (SO). A meta-analysis was performed aiming to summarize the available evidence on weight loss (primary outcome) and comorbidities resolution of LRYGB and LSG in patients with SO (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2). From the 16 included studies, 7 integrated the meta-analysis. LRYGB showed a significantly higher weight loss at 6 to 12-months, but not after 24 months and a higher dyslipidemia resolution at 12 months. When compared with LSG, LRYGB achieved better weight loss after 6 and 12 months and higher dyslipidemia resolution after 1 year. There were no significant differences for resolution of the other co-morbidities studied. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0960-8923 1708-0428 1708-0428 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11695-021-05745-8 |