Different grinding speeds affect induced regeneration capacity of human treated dentin matrix

Human‐treated dentin matrix (hTDM) is a biomaterial scaffold, which can induce implant cells to differentiate into odontoblasts and then form neo‐dentin. However, hTDM with long storage or prepared by high‐speed handpiece would not to form neo‐dentin. In this research, we developed two fresh hTDM wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials Applied biomaterials, 2022-04, Vol.110 (4), p.755-767
Hauptverfasser: Li, Min, Yang, Sen, Song, Jinlin, Fu, Tiwei, Liang, Panpan, Gao, Zhi, Tang, Jing, Guo, Lijuan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Human‐treated dentin matrix (hTDM) is a biomaterial scaffold, which can induce implant cells to differentiate into odontoblasts and then form neo‐dentin. However, hTDM with long storage or prepared by high‐speed handpiece would not to form neo‐dentin. In this research, we developed two fresh hTDM with different grinding speeds, which were low‐speed hTDM (LTDM) with maximum speed of 500 rpm and high‐speed hTDM (HTDM) with a speed of 3,80,000 rpm. Here, we aim to understand whether there were induced regeneration capacity differences between LTDM and HTDM. Scanning electron microscope showed that DFCs grew well on both materials, but the morphology of DFCs and the extracellular matrix was different. Especially, the secreted extracellular matrixes on the inner surface of LTDM were regular morphology and ordered arrangement around the dentin tubules. The transcription‐quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR), western blot and immunofluorescence assay showed that the dentin markers DSPP and DMP‐1 were about 2× greater in DFCs induced by LTDM than by HTDM, and osteogenic marker BSP was about 2× greater in DFCs induced by HTDM than by LTDM. Histological examinations of the harvested grafts observed the formation of neo‐tissue were different, and there were neo‐dentin formed on the inner surface of LTDM and neo‐cementum formed on the outer surface of HTDM. In summary, it found that the induction abilities of LTDM and HTDM are different, and the dentin matrix is directional. This study lays a necessary foundation for searching the key factors of dentin regeneration in future.
ISSN:1552-4973
1552-4981
DOI:10.1002/jbm.b.34954