Real‐world use of first‐generation antiandrogens: impact on patient outcomes and subsequent therapies in metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer

Objectives To investigate the recent real‐world use of first‐generation antiandrogens (FGAs) in metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) using a retrospective multicentre cohort study. Patients and Methods The electronic CRPC Australian Database (ePAD) was interrogated to identify pat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJU international 2021-10, Vol.128 (S1), p.18-26
Hauptverfasser: Kelly, Richard, Anton, Angelyn, Wong, Shirley, Shapiro, Julia, Weickhardt, Andrew, Azad, Arun, Kwan, Edmond Michael, Spain, Lavinia, Muthusamy, Arun, Torres, Javier, Parente, Phillip, Parnis, Francis, Goh, Jeffrey, Joshua, Anthony, Pook, David, Baenziger, Olivia, Gibbs, Peter, Tran, Ben
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To investigate the recent real‐world use of first‐generation antiandrogens (FGAs) in metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) using a retrospective multicentre cohort study. Patients and Methods The electronic CRPC Australian Database (ePAD) was interrogated to identify patients with mCRPC. Clinicopathological features, treatment and outcome data, stratified by FGA use, were retrieved and reported through descriptive statistics. Survival analyses were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and groups compared using log‐rank tests. Factors influencing overall survival (OS) were analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results We identified 634 patients with mCRPC, enrolled in ePAD between January 2016 and March 2019, including 322 (51%) who received FGAs. The median follow‐up was 21.9 months. Patients treated with FGAs were more likely to have lower International Society of Urological Pathologists (ISUP) grade group (P = 0.04), longer median time to CRPC (25.6 vs 16.0 months, P 
ISSN:1464-4096
1464-410X
DOI:10.1111/bju.15364