Evaluation of the root filling quality with experimental carrier‐based obturators: a CLSM and FEG‐SEM analysis

This study evaluated tubule penetration of GuttaFlow Bioseal with cold single cone or carrier‐based technique, under confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Twenty straight single‐rooted teeth were instrumented with Hyflex CM and divided in two groups (n = 10) according to the obturation method:...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australian endodontic journal 2022-12, Vol.48 (3), p.400-408
Hauptverfasser: Pirani, Chiara, Generali, Luigi, Iacono, Francesco, Cavani, Francesco, Prati, Carlo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study evaluated tubule penetration of GuttaFlow Bioseal with cold single cone or carrier‐based technique, under confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Twenty straight single‐rooted teeth were instrumented with Hyflex CM and divided in two groups (n = 10) according to the obturation method: single cold gutta‐percha cones; experimental carrier‐based obturators. GuttaFlow Bioseal, labelled with Rhodamine B dye, was used as sealer in both groups. Teeth transversally sectioned were observed under CLSM. Percentage of sealer penetration and integrity of sealer layer perimeter were measured. Surface and microstructural characteristics of obturators and gutta‐percha cones were compared by FEG‐SEM and EDX analysis. No significant differences were found between groups for each examined parameter. Significant differences (P 
ISSN:1329-1947
1747-4477
DOI:10.1111/aej.12577