History of pandemic H1N1-containing influenza vaccination and risk for spontaneous abortion and birth defects

•Assessed safety of a boosting vs. priming pandemic H1N1 vaccine dose in pregnancy.•Restricted study population to vaccine-compliant U.S. military women.•Detected no increased risks for spontaneous abortion or birth defects. One recent study suggested an association between receipt of pandemic H1N1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vaccine 2021-10, Vol.39 (44), p.6553-6562
Hauptverfasser: Romano, Celeste J., Hall, Clinton, Khodr, Zeina G., Bukowinski, Anna T., Gumbs, Gia R., Conlin, Ava Marie S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Assessed safety of a boosting vs. priming pandemic H1N1 vaccine dose in pregnancy.•Restricted study population to vaccine-compliant U.S. military women.•Detected no increased risks for spontaneous abortion or birth defects. One recent study suggested an association between receipt of pandemic H1N1 (pH1N1)-containing vaccines in consecutive influenza seasons and spontaneous abortion, but corroborating scientific evidence is limited. In the present study, we leveraged a population of vaccine-compliant pregnant military women to examine history of pH1N1-containing influenza vaccination and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Because seasonal influenza vaccination is compulsory for military service, safety concerns regarding repeat vaccination are particularly relevant in this population. Pregnancies and live births from Department of Defense Birth and Infant Health Research program data were linked with military personnel immunization records to identify women vaccinated with a pH1N1-containing vaccine in pregnancy prior to 21 6/7 weeks’ gestation, October 2009–April 2015. Cox and modified Poisson regression models estimated associations between vaccination with pH1N1- versus non–pH1N1-containing influenza vaccine in the season prior to the index pregnancy, and spontaneous abortion and birth defects, respectively. Cox models were calculated for two periods of follow-up: through (1) 21 6/7 weeks’ gestation and (2) 28 days postvaccination. Of 26,264 pregnancies, 21,736 (82.8%) were among women who received a dose of pH1N1-containing vaccine in the prior influenza season and 4,528 (17.2%) were among women who received non–pH1N1-containing vaccine in the prior influenza season. Among 23,121 infants, 19,365 (83.8%) and 3,756 (16.2%) had mothers exposed and unexposed to pH1N1-containing vaccine in the prior influenza season, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for spontaneous abortion approximated 1.0 across the complete follow-up period (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89–1.13) and was slightly elevated when censored at 28 days postvaccination, though the CI was imprecise (aHR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.97–1.46). No associations with birth defects were observed. This work lends additional safety evidence and support for vaccination against pH1N1 in pregnancy, regardless of the vaccine received in the prior influenza season.
ISSN:0264-410X
1873-2518
DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.09.003