Pelvic floor dysfunction after vaginal delivery: MOODS—a prospective study

Introduction and hypothesis Labor is a known risk factor for pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD); however, the impact of operative vaginal delivery (OVD), particularly spatulas, remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare postpartum PFD symptoms in women undergoing spontaneous vaginal delivery...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International Urogynecology Journal 2022-06, Vol.33 (6), p.1539-1547
Hauptverfasser: Borges, Ana Catarina, Sousa, Natacha, Sarabando, Rita, Vieira, Catarina, Ribeiro, Bárbara, Barbosa, Paulina, Miranda, Alexandra, Reis, Isabel, Nogueira-Silva, Cristina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction and hypothesis Labor is a known risk factor for pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD); however, the impact of operative vaginal delivery (OVD), particularly spatulas, remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare postpartum PFD symptoms in women undergoing spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) and those undergoing OVD. Methods An observational prospective study (MOODS: Maternal-neonatal Outcomes in Operative Vaginal Delivery) was enrolled at Hospital de Braga from February to October 2018. All singleton term OVD (Thierry spatulas and vacuum extractor) and a convenience SVD sample were recruited, in a 2:1 ratio. To assess PFD symptoms Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) was applied at 3, 6, and 12 months postpartum. The questionnaire is divided into three subscales: Urinary (UDI), Colorectal-Anal (CRADI), and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI). Results Of the 304 women recruited, 207 were included, 34.3% with SVD and 65.7% with OVD. Thierry spatulas were used in 53.7% of women undergoing OVD. Frequency of nulliparous ( p  
ISSN:0937-3462
1433-3023
DOI:10.1007/s00192-021-04982-w